Study Guide

Objective

Games Now! is an open lecture series on the dominant issues and emerging trends in games. The topics are curated in collaboration with Finnish game industry veterans and our top companies. After completing the course, the student will be familiar with the current trends and issues in the games industry. The student will be able to combine industry information with research topics and produce a research article on a selected topic.

Content

The course content is provided by Aalto University Games Now! (GN!) series.

GN! Lectures online either live or recorded
GN! Podcast
GN! Community

Location and time

6.11.2023
19.2.2024

Materials

https://gamesnow.aalto.fi/

Teaching methods

he course content is provided by Aalto University Games Now! (GN!) series.

GN! Lectures online either live or recorded
GN! Podcast
GN! Community

Further information

See Reppu https://reppu.kamk.fi/course/view.php?id=720

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

Attended 4 or more GN! Event Days and consistently participated in the GN! Discord server with meaningful posts throughout the course. Completed 6 or more lecture assignments with a strong understanding of the course topics and the ability to describe them in a comprehensive manner. Written an outstanding 2000-3000 word academic paper that thoroughly explored the chosen topic or sub-theme of a lecture. Utilised more than 4 academic references, demonstrating critical thinking and strict compliance with citation and formatting guidelines.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Attended 2-3 GN! Event Days or was moderately active on the GN! Discord server with regular posts. Completed 6 lecture assignments with a good understanding of the course topics and the ability to describe them effectively. Written a solid academic paper of 2000-3000 words, exploring the chosen topic or sub-theme of a lecture. Used at least 2-4 academic references and followed citation and formatting guidelines effectively.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

Attended 2 GN! Event Day or was somewhat active on the GN! Discord server, with occasional posts. Completed 6 lecture assignments with a basic understanding of the course topics and some ability to describe them. Written a 2000-3000 word academic paper exploring the chosen topic or sub-theme of a lecture, but lacking depth or critical analysis. Used 2 academic references with some problems of citation and formatting.

Further information

https://gamesnow.aalto.fi/
https://www.twitch.tv/gamesnowaaltofi

Objective

The aim of this module is to familiarise with the international game business.

Student is able to understand the importance of international business environment and global markets. Students will acquire knowledge on leading in international game development environment, emerging trends and business models. Student will learn to analyse global game industry and evaluate factors positioning in the industry. Student is able to evaluate existing research data and use information on decision-making and implementation.

Content

Game Industry
International Business Environment
Leading international Game Development and Publishing
Global Market Analysis and Strategies
Monetization Models and Business Models
International Partnerships and Collaborations
Emerging Trends and Innovations

Location and time

14.11. 16-18
21.11. 16-18
28.11. 16-18
12.12. 16-18

Materials

Course material is in Reppu.

Teaching methods

Online lessons, tasks and assignments and quizzes in Reppu.

Employer connections

Visiting lectures from game industry and research.

Exam schedules

Assignments according to schedule in Reppu.

International connections

Visiting lecturer from international partner.

Completion alternatives

Accreditation or agreeing on studification.

Student workload

This course is a 5 ECTS course, that means about 135 hours of student work.
8 hours of lectures online

Content scheduling

Game Industry
International Business Environment
Leading international Game Development and Publishing
Global Market Analysis and Strategies
Monetization Models and Business Models
International Partnerships and Collaborations
Emerging Trends and Innovations

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

All learning outcomes/ assessment criteria have been achieved to an exceptionally high-level demonstrating the following attributes:

- Exceptional understanding, exploration, insight, and application of the theories and concepts learned.
- Clear adherence to all specifications for the assessment task, including word limit where appropriate
- The organization, structure, and standard of output, including any subject-specific conventions, where applicable, are of very high quality throughout
- Evidence of effective communication of work to peers and others
- Offer stimulating and rigorous arguments that are likely to be at the limits of what may be expected at this level
- The coursework has been executed/performed in an original way
- Outstanding ability to reach appropriate decisions based on incomplete or complex evidence
- Evidence of very high-quality analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and critical appraisal
- Evidence of outstanding problem-solving skills and ability to suggests alternative approaches
- Evidence of outstanding ability to address complex issues both systematically and creatively

Assessment criteria, good (3)

All learning outcomes/ assessment criteria have been met fully at a good or very good standard demonstrating the following attributes:

- Good to very good understanding, exploration, insight, and application of the theories and concepts learned.
- No significant inaccuracies, misunderstandings or errors
- Clear adherence to all specifications for the assessment task, including word limit where appropriate
- The organization, structure, and standard of output, including any subject-specific conventions, where appropriate, are of reasonable to good quality throughout
- Evidence of sufficiently effective communication of work
- Ability to present structured, clear and concise arguments
- The work has been approached and/or executed/performed in a comprehensive way with some degree of originality

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

All learning outcomes/ assessment criteria have been met demonstrating the following attributes:

- Evidence of sufficient ability to reach appropriate decisions based on incomplete or complex evidence
- Evidence of reasonable quality analysis, synthesis, evaluation and critical appraisal
- Evidence of sufficient problem solving skills and ability to suggest alternative approaches
- Demonstrate some ability to develop an argument but can lack fluency
- The coursework has been approached and/or executed/performed in a standard way with limited evidence of originality
- Some contextualization on a limited number of sources and, in general, the breadth and depth of sources and research are lacking
- Evidence of study and demonstration of the ability to reach appropriate decisions based on incomplete or complex evidence

Assessment methods and criteria

Student is able to understand the importance of international business environment and global markets. Students will acquire knowledge on leading in international game development environment, emerging trends and business models. Student will learn to analyse global game industry and evaluate factors positioning in the industry. Student is able to evaluate existing research
data and use information on decision-making and implementation.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Learning outcomes/ assessment criteria has not been met.

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

- Exceptional understanding, exploration, insight, and application of the theories and concepts
learned.
- Clear adherence to all specifications for the assessment task, including word limit where
appropriate
- The organization, structure, and standard of output, including any subject-specific conventions,
where applicable, are of very high quality throughout
- Evidence of effective communication of work to peers and others
- Offer stimulating and rigorous arguments that are likely to be at the limits of what may be expected
at this level
- The coursework has been executed/performed in an original way
- Outstanding ability to reach appropriate decisions based on incomplete or complex evidence
- Evidence of very high-quality analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and critical appraisal
- Evidence of outstanding problem-solving skills and ability to suggests alternative approaches
- Evidence of outstanding ability to address complex issues both systematically and creatively

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

All learning outcomes/ assessment criteria have been met fully at a good or very good standard
demonstrating the following attributes:
- Good to very good understanding, exploration, insight, and application of the theories and concepts
learned.
- No significant inaccuracies, misunderstandings or errors
- Clear adherence to all specifications for the assessment task, including word limit where
appropriate
- The organization, structure, and standard of output, including any subject-specific conventions,
where appropriate, are of reasonable to good quality throughout
- Evidence of sufficiently effective communication of work
- Ability to present structured, clear and concise arguments
- The work has been approached and/or executed/performed in a comprehensive way with some
degree of originality

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

All learning outcomes/ assessment criteria have been met demonstrating the following attributes:
- Evidence of sufficient ability to reach appropriate decisions based on incomplete or complex
evidence
- Evidence of reasonable quality analysis, synthesis, evaluation and critical appraisal
- Evidence of sufficient problem solving skills and ability to suggest alternative approaches
- Demonstrate some ability to develop an argument but can lack fluency
- The coursework has been approached and/or executed/performed in a standard way with limited
evidence of originality
- Some contextualization on a limited number of sources and, in general, the breadth and depth of
sources and research are lacking
- Evidence of study and demonstration of the ability to reach appropriate decisions based on
incomplete or complex evidence

Objective

Games Now! is an open lecture series on the dominant issues and emerging trends in games. The topics are curated in collaboration with Finnish game industry veterans and our top companies. After completing the course, the student will be familiar with the current trends and issues in the games industry. The student will be able to combine industry information with research topics and produce a research article on a selected topic.

Content

The course content is provided by Aalto University Games Now! (GN!) series.

GN! Lectures online either live or recorded
GN! Podcast
GN! Community

Location and time

6.11.2023
19.2.2024

Materials

https://gamesnow.aalto.fi/

Teaching methods

he course content is provided by Aalto University Games Now! (GN!) series.

GN! Lectures online either live or recorded
GN! Podcast
GN! Community

Further information

See Reppu https://reppu.kamk.fi/course/view.php?id=720

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

Attended 4 or more GN! Event Days and consistently participated in the GN! Discord server with meaningful posts throughout the course. Completed 6 or more lecture assignments with a strong understanding of the course topics and the ability to describe them in a comprehensive manner. Written an outstanding 2000-3000 word academic paper that thoroughly explored the chosen topic or sub-theme of a lecture. Utilised more than 4 academic references, demonstrating critical thinking and strict compliance with citation and formatting guidelines.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Attended 2-3 GN! Event Days or was moderately active on the GN! Discord server with regular posts. Completed 6 lecture assignments with a good understanding of the course topics and the ability to describe them effectively. Written a solid academic paper of 2000-3000 words, exploring the chosen topic or sub-theme of a lecture. Used at least 2-4 academic references and followed citation and formatting guidelines effectively.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

Attended 2 GN! Event Day or was somewhat active on the GN! Discord server, with occasional posts. Completed 6 lecture assignments with a basic understanding of the course topics and some ability to describe them. Written a 2000-3000 word academic paper exploring the chosen topic or sub-theme of a lecture, but lacking depth or critical analysis. Used 2 academic references with some problems of citation and formatting.

Further information

https://gamesnow.aalto.fi/
https://www.twitch.tv/gamesnowaaltofi

Objective

The aim of this module is to familiarise with the international game business.

Student is able to understand the importance of international business environment and global markets. Students will acquire knowledge on leading in international game development environment, emerging trends and business models. Student will learn to analyse global game industry and evaluate factors positioning in the industry. Student is able to evaluate existing research data and use information on decision-making and implementation.

Content

Game Industry
International Business Environment
Leading international Game Development and Publishing
Global Market Analysis and Strategies
Monetization Models and Business Models
International Partnerships and Collaborations
Emerging Trends and Innovations

Location and time

14.11. 16-18
21.11. 16-18
28.11. 16-18
12.12. 16-18

Materials

Course material is in Reppu.

Teaching methods

Online lessons, tasks and assignments and quizzes in Reppu.

Employer connections

Visiting lectures from game industry and research.

Exam schedules

Assignments according to schedule in Reppu.

International connections

Visiting lecturer from international partner.

Completion alternatives

Accreditation or agreeing on studification.

Student workload

This course is a 5 ECTS course, that means about 135 hours of student work.
8 hours of lectures online

Content scheduling

Game Industry
International Business Environment
Leading international Game Development and Publishing
Global Market Analysis and Strategies
Monetization Models and Business Models
International Partnerships and Collaborations
Emerging Trends and Innovations

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

All learning outcomes/ assessment criteria have been achieved to an exceptionally high-level demonstrating the following attributes:

- Exceptional understanding, exploration, insight, and application of the theories and concepts learned.
- Clear adherence to all specifications for the assessment task, including word limit where appropriate
- The organization, structure, and standard of output, including any subject-specific conventions, where applicable, are of very high quality throughout
- Evidence of effective communication of work to peers and others
- Offer stimulating and rigorous arguments that are likely to be at the limits of what may be expected at this level
- The coursework has been executed/performed in an original way
- Outstanding ability to reach appropriate decisions based on incomplete or complex evidence
- Evidence of very high-quality analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and critical appraisal
- Evidence of outstanding problem-solving skills and ability to suggests alternative approaches
- Evidence of outstanding ability to address complex issues both systematically and creatively

Assessment criteria, good (3)

All learning outcomes/ assessment criteria have been met fully at a good or very good standard demonstrating the following attributes:

- Good to very good understanding, exploration, insight, and application of the theories and concepts learned.
- No significant inaccuracies, misunderstandings or errors
- Clear adherence to all specifications for the assessment task, including word limit where appropriate
- The organization, structure, and standard of output, including any subject-specific conventions, where appropriate, are of reasonable to good quality throughout
- Evidence of sufficiently effective communication of work
- Ability to present structured, clear and concise arguments
- The work has been approached and/or executed/performed in a comprehensive way with some degree of originality

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

All learning outcomes/ assessment criteria have been met demonstrating the following attributes:

- Evidence of sufficient ability to reach appropriate decisions based on incomplete or complex evidence
- Evidence of reasonable quality analysis, synthesis, evaluation and critical appraisal
- Evidence of sufficient problem solving skills and ability to suggest alternative approaches
- Demonstrate some ability to develop an argument but can lack fluency
- The coursework has been approached and/or executed/performed in a standard way with limited evidence of originality
- Some contextualization on a limited number of sources and, in general, the breadth and depth of sources and research are lacking
- Evidence of study and demonstration of the ability to reach appropriate decisions based on incomplete or complex evidence

Assessment methods and criteria

Student is able to understand the importance of international business environment and global markets. Students will acquire knowledge on leading in international game development environment, emerging trends and business models. Student will learn to analyse global game industry and evaluate factors positioning in the industry. Student is able to evaluate existing research
data and use information on decision-making and implementation.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Learning outcomes/ assessment criteria has not been met.

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

- Exceptional understanding, exploration, insight, and application of the theories and concepts
learned.
- Clear adherence to all specifications for the assessment task, including word limit where
appropriate
- The organization, structure, and standard of output, including any subject-specific conventions,
where applicable, are of very high quality throughout
- Evidence of effective communication of work to peers and others
- Offer stimulating and rigorous arguments that are likely to be at the limits of what may be expected
at this level
- The coursework has been executed/performed in an original way
- Outstanding ability to reach appropriate decisions based on incomplete or complex evidence
- Evidence of very high-quality analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and critical appraisal
- Evidence of outstanding problem-solving skills and ability to suggests alternative approaches
- Evidence of outstanding ability to address complex issues both systematically and creatively

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

All learning outcomes/ assessment criteria have been met fully at a good or very good standard
demonstrating the following attributes:
- Good to very good understanding, exploration, insight, and application of the theories and concepts
learned.
- No significant inaccuracies, misunderstandings or errors
- Clear adherence to all specifications for the assessment task, including word limit where
appropriate
- The organization, structure, and standard of output, including any subject-specific conventions,
where appropriate, are of reasonable to good quality throughout
- Evidence of sufficiently effective communication of work
- Ability to present structured, clear and concise arguments
- The work has been approached and/or executed/performed in a comprehensive way with some
degree of originality

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

All learning outcomes/ assessment criteria have been met demonstrating the following attributes:
- Evidence of sufficient ability to reach appropriate decisions based on incomplete or complex
evidence
- Evidence of reasonable quality analysis, synthesis, evaluation and critical appraisal
- Evidence of sufficient problem solving skills and ability to suggest alternative approaches
- Demonstrate some ability to develop an argument but can lack fluency
- The coursework has been approached and/or executed/performed in a standard way with limited
evidence of originality
- Some contextualization on a limited number of sources and, in general, the breadth and depth of
sources and research are lacking
- Evidence of study and demonstration of the ability to reach appropriate decisions based on
incomplete or complex evidence