Art Foundation (3 cr)
Code: TT00BL74-3009
General information
- Enrollment
-
01.12.2023 - 31.01.2024
Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
-
01.01.2024 - 31.07.2024
Implementation has ended.
- Number of ECTS credits allocated
- 3 cr
- Local portion
- 3 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Contact learning
- Unit
- Teknologia
- Teaching languages
- Finnish
- Degree programmes
- Bachelor’s Degree in Business Information Technology
Realization has 5 reservations. Total duration of reservations is 16 h 15 min.
| Time | Topic | Location |
|---|---|---|
|
Mon 22.04.2024 time 12:30 - 15:45 (3 h 15 min) |
Taiteen perusteet TT00BL74-3009 |
TA12L130
TA12L130
|
|
Mon 29.04.2024 time 12:30 - 15:45 (3 h 15 min) |
Taiteen perusteet TT00BL74-3009 |
TA12L130
TA12L130
|
|
Mon 06.05.2024 time 12:30 - 15:45 (3 h 15 min) |
Taiteen perusteet TT00BL74-3009 |
TA11L155
TA11L155
|
|
Mon 13.05.2024 time 12:30 - 15:45 (3 h 15 min) |
Taiteen perusteet TT00BL74-3009 |
TA11L155
TA11L155
|
|
Mon 20.05.2024 time 12:30 - 15:45 (3 h 15 min) |
Taiteen perusteet TT00BL74-3009 |
TA11L155
TA11L155
|
Objective
The student understands the fundamentals of art and can apply them in practice. The student is able to observe their surroundings and replicate to visually using the fundamentals of art. The student understands the fundamentals and techniques of art.
Content
Basics of drawing human anatomy
Lights and shadows, shading
Perspective
Shapes and lines
Composition
Color Theory
Location and time
Onsite
Materials
Drawing pencils, paper, eraser, ruler
Teaching methods
Lectures and assignments
Completion alternatives
Previously acquired competence that can be verified on the basis of evidence.
Evaluation scale
0 - 5
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
All assignments are returned. The quality is supreme and extra effort is seen in delivering well-rendered work.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
4 = All assignments are returned. The quality is excellent.
3= All assignments are returned. The quality is good, with slight mistakes.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
2 = All assignments are returned. Quality is incoherent and messy, but readable or has cut corners.
1 = All assignments are returned. Quality leaves a lot to be desired.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Numerical evaluation. Fail = All or some assignments are not returned by the deadline or the quality is severely lacking.
Assessment criteria, fail (0)
All or some assignments are not returned by the deadline or the quality is severely lacking.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
All assignments are returned. The quality is supreme and extra effort is seen in delivering well-rendered work.
Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)
4 = All assignments are returned. The quality is excellent.
3= All assignments are returned. The quality is good, with slight mistakes.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
2 = All assignments are returned. Quality is incoherent and messy, but readable or has cut corners.
1 = All assignments are returned. Quality leaves a lot to be desired.
Further information
The student acquires the required equipment themselves