Master Winter School (5 op)
Toteutuksen tunnus: LY00CG27-3004
Toteutuksen perustiedot
- Ilmoittautumisaika
-
01.08.2025 - 31.12.2025
Ilmoittautuminen toteutukselle ei ole vielä alkanut.
- Ajoitus
-
12.01.2026 - 17.05.2026
Toteutus ei ole vielä alkanut.
- Opintopistemäärä
- 5 op
- Lähiosuus
- 0 op
- Virtuaaliosuus
- 5 op
- TKI-osuus
- 3 op
- Toteutustapa
- Etäopetus
- Yksikkö
- KAMK Master School
- Opetuskielet
- englanti
- Koulutus
- Vastuullisen liiketoiminnan kehittämisen ja johtamisen koulutus
- Opettajat
- Jaana Lappalainen
- Päivi Karhu
- Ryhmät
-
LBY25SLBY25S
-
LYL25SVLYL25SV
-
LYL25SLYL25S
-
ALY25SALY25S
-
AYM25SAYM25S
-
TTY25STTY25S
-
TJY25STJY25S
-
EJY25KEJY25K
-
DAY25SDAY25S
- Opintojakso
- LY00CG27
Arviointiasteikko
0 - 5
Tavoitteet
Students will
• gain knowledge on sustainability and how to manage consequences of business (foot print and hand print)
• acquire knowledge on how businesses should take into account their responsibilities toward people, planet and society
• learn the requirements of sustainable business and how to develop and adapt truly sustainable and responsible business, code of conduct policies and compliance
Toteutustavat
Online intensive 3-days programme including lectures and workshops/group work - in February 2024 week 7
Suoritustavat
Pre-task (1 ects) + introduction session in one evening in January
Group tasks and workshops during the online days (1 ects)
Teams – lectures and workshops on Tue-Thu )
Course assignment (3 ects)
Sisältö
Climate Change
Sustainability
Corporate Social Responsibility
Code of Conduct
Compliance
Oppimateriaalit
To be annouced later
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)
All learning outcomes/ assessment criteria have been met demonstrating the following attributes:
- Evidence of sufficient problem solving skills and ability to suggest alternative approaches
- Demonstrate some ability to develop an argument but can lack fluency
- The coursework has been approached and/or executed/performed in a standard way with limited
evidence of originality
- Some contextualization but with a heavy reliance on a limited number of sources and, in general,
the breadth and depth of sources and research are lacking
- Evidence of study and demonstration of the ability to reach appropriate decisions based on
incomplete or complex evidence
- Some, but limited evidence of analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and critical appraisal
- Some evidence of problem-solving skills
- Some evidence of ability to address complex issues adequately
Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)
All learning outcomes/ assessment criteria have been met fully at a good or very good standard
demonstrating the following attributes:
- Good to very good understanding, exploration, insight, and application of the theories and concepts learned.
- No significant inaccuracies, misunderstandings or errors
- Clear adherence to all specifications for the assessment task, including word limit where
appropriate
- The organization, structure, and standard of output, including any subject-specific conventions,
where appropriate, are of reasonable to good quality throughout
- Evidence of sufficiently effective communication of work
- Ability to present structured, clear and concise arguments
- The work has been approached and/or executed/performed in a comprehensive way with some
degree of originality
- Evidence of sufficient ability to reach appropriate decisions based on incomplete or complex
evidence
- Evidence of reasonable to good quality analysis, synthesis, evaluation and critical appraisal
- Evidence of sufficient problem solving skills and ability to suggest alternative approaches
Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)
All learning outcomes/ assessment criteria have been achieved to an exceptionally high-level
demonstrating the following attributes:
- Exceptional understanding, exploration, insight, and application of the theories and concepts
learned.
- Clear adherence to all specifications for the assessment task, including word limit where
appropriate
- The organization, structure, and standard of output, including any subject-specific conventions,
where applicable, are of very high quality throughout
- Evidence of effective communication of work to peers and others
- Offer stimulating and rigorous arguments that are likely to be at the limits of what may be expected
at this level
- The coursework has been executed/performed in an original way
- Outstanding ability to reach appropriate decisions based on incomplete or complex evidence
- Evidence of very high-quality analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and critical appraisal
- Evidence of outstanding problem-solving skills and ability to suggests alternative approaches
- Evidence of outstanding ability to address complex issues both systematically and creatively
Esitietovaatimukset
Open mind