Study Guide

Objective

Students will possess the basic ability to develop their expertise in order to carry out different research and development projects, while understanding how they add to their expertise. They will be able to critically assess knowledge generated by research and development work.

Content

Basis of research and development
Qualitative research process
Quantitative research process
Research material analysis and interpretation

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The students are able to use research and development concepts in a variety of ways and with expertise.
They are able to analyse and critically assess completed research.
The students are able to analyse, compare, combine and select information and present alternative procedures in research and development processes.
They are able to analyse, reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently, responsibly and with initiative. They can work as a member of a group promoting and developing the group's activities to achieve common goals. They are able to critically apply ethical principles in their work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use fundamental research and development concepts systematically.
They are able to describe various research and development processes and justify related solutions. The students are able to analyse completed research. They are able to select appropriate research and development procedures based on acquired knowledge. They are able to reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently and responsibly. They can work as a member of a group to achieve common goals. They are able to justify their work according to ethical principles

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The students are able to use appropriate research and development concepts. They are able to describe the main features of the research and development process in general. The students are able to describe a piece of completed research.
They are able to systematically plan the implementation of method(s) used in a research and development process, though some uncertainty may be apparent. The students are able to use appropriate research and development methods under super vision. They can work as a member of a group taking responsibility for their own actions and other group members into account.

Objective

Students will possess the basic ability to develop their expertise in order to carry out different research and development projects, while understanding how they add to their expertise. They will be able to critically assess knowledge generated by research and development work.

Content

Basis of research and development
Qualitative research process
Quantitative research process
Research material analysis and interpretation

Materials

Kirjallisuus on ilmoitettu Moodlessa. Kirjallisuus koostuu verkossa olevista materiaaleista ja luentomateriaalista.

Teaching methods

Opetus on toteutettu lähitoteutuksena. Luennot, itsenäiset harjoitustehtävät ja ryhmätyöskentely. Kurssipohja löytyy Moodlesta.

Exam schedules

Tenttien ajankohdat ilmoitetaan Moodlessa.

Completion alternatives

AHOT tarkastellaan tapauskohtaisesti.

Student workload

5 op itsenäistä työtä eli 135 tuntia opiskelutyötä.

Content scheduling

Määrällinen tutkimus (2 op)
-Tutkimus- ja kehittämistoiminnan lähtökohdat
-Aineiston analyysi ja tulkinta

Laadullinen tutkimus (3 op)
-Tutkimus- ja kehittämistoiminnan lähtökohdat
-Aineiston analyysi ja tulkinta

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The students are able to use research and development concepts in a variety of ways and with expertise.
They are able to analyse and critically assess completed research.
The students are able to analyse, compare, combine and select information and present alternative procedures in research and development processes.
They are able to analyse, reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently, responsibly and with initiative. They can work as a member of a group promoting and developing the group's activities to achieve common goals. They are able to critically apply ethical principles in their work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use fundamental research and development concepts systematically.
They are able to describe various research and development processes and justify related solutions. The students are able to analyse completed research. They are able to select appropriate research and development procedures based on acquired knowledge. They are able to reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently and responsibly. They can work as a member of a group to achieve common goals. They are able to justify their work according to ethical principles

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The students are able to use appropriate research and development concepts. They are able to describe the main features of the research and development process in general. The students are able to describe a piece of completed research.
They are able to systematically plan the implementation of method(s) used in a research and development process, though some uncertainty may be apparent. The students are able to use appropriate research and development methods under super vision. They can work as a member of a group taking responsibility for their own actions and other group members into account.

Assessment methods and criteria

Määrällinen tutkimus (2 op) (Arviointi: 0-5)
-Tentti

Laadullinen tutkimus (3 op) (Arviointi: 0-5)
-Laadullinen tutkimustehtävä
-Kyselytutkimuksen laatiminen
-Tutkimusraportti

Kurssin arvosana lasketaan painotetun keskiarvon mukaan määrällisen ja laadullisen tutkimuksen arvosanojen pohjalta.
Tarkemmat arviointiperusteet eri tehtävien osalta on ilmoitettu Moodlessa.

Objective

Students will possess the basic ability to develop their expertise in order to carry out different research and development projects, while understanding how they add to their expertise. They will be able to critically assess knowledge generated by research and development work.

Content

Basis of research and development
Qualitative research process
Quantitative research process
Research material analysis and interpretation

Materials

Kirjallisuus on ilmoitettu Moodlessa. Kirjallisuus koostuu verkossa olevista materiaaleista ja luentomateriaalista.

Teaching methods

Opetus on toteutettu etä- ja lähitoteutuksena. Pääpaino etäopetuksessa ja itsenäisessä opiskelussa. Kurssipohja löytyy Moodlesta.

Exam schedules

Tenttien ajankohdat ilmoitetaan Moodlessa.

Completion alternatives

AHOT tarkastellaan tapauskohtaisesti.

Student workload

5 op itsenäistä työtä eli 135 tuntia opiskelutyötä.

Content scheduling

Määrällinen tutkimus (2 op)
-Tutkimus- ja kehittämistoiminnan lähtökohdat
-Aineiston analyysi ja tulkinta

Laadullinen tutkimus (3 op)
-Tutkimus- ja kehittämistoiminnan lähtökohdat
-Aineiston analyysi ja tulkinta
-Tuotteistamisprosessi

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The students are able to use research and development concepts in a variety of ways and with expertise.
They are able to analyse and critically assess completed research.
The students are able to analyse, compare, combine and select information and present alternative procedures in research and development processes.
They are able to analyse, reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently, responsibly and with initiative. They can work as a member of a group promoting and developing the group's activities to achieve common goals. They are able to critically apply ethical principles in their work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use fundamental research and development concepts systematically.
They are able to describe various research and development processes and justify related solutions. The students are able to analyse completed research. They are able to select appropriate research and development procedures based on acquired knowledge. They are able to reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently and responsibly. They can work as a member of a group to achieve common goals. They are able to justify their work according to ethical principles

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The students are able to use appropriate research and development concepts. They are able to describe the main features of the research and development process in general. The students are able to describe a piece of completed research.
They are able to systematically plan the implementation of method(s) used in a research and development process, though some uncertainty may be apparent. The students are able to use appropriate research and development methods under super vision. They can work as a member of a group taking responsibility for their own actions and other group members into account.

Assessment methods and criteria

Määrällinen tutkimus (2 op) (Arviointi: 0-5)
-Tentti

Laadullinen tutkimus (3 op) (Arviointi: 0-5)
-Opinnäytetyöanalyysi
-Laadullinen tutkimustehtävä
-Kyselytutkimuksen laatiminen

Kurssin arvosana lasketaan painotetun keskiarvon mukaan määrällisen ja laadullisen tutkimuksen arvosanojen pohjalta.
Tarkemmat arviointiperusteet eri tehtävien osalta on ilmoitettu Moodlessa.

Objective

Students will possess the basic ability to develop their expertise in order to carry out different research and development projects, while understanding how they add to their expertise. They will be able to critically assess knowledge generated by research and development work.

Content

Basis of research and development
Qualitative research process
Quantitative research process
Research material analysis and interpretation

Materials

Kirjallisuus on ilmoitettu Moodlessa. Kirjallisuus koostuu verkossa olevista materiaaleista ja luentomateriaalista.

Teaching methods

Opetus on toteutettu lähitoteutuksena. Luennot, itsenäiset harjoitustehtävät ja ryhmätyöskentely. Kurssipohja löytyy Moodlesta.

Exam schedules

Tenttien ajankohdat ilmoitetaan Moodlessa.

Completion alternatives

AHOT tarkastellaan tapauskohtaisesti.

Student workload

5 op itsenäistä työtä eli 135 tuntia opiskelutyötä.

Content scheduling

Määrällinen tutkimus (2 op)
-Tutkimus- ja kehittämistoiminnan lähtökohdat
-Aineiston analyysi ja tulkinta

Laadullinen tutkimus (3 op)
-Tutkimus- ja kehittämistoiminnan lähtökohdat
-Aineiston analyysi ja tulkinta

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The students are able to use research and development concepts in a variety of ways and with expertise.
They are able to analyse and critically assess completed research.
The students are able to analyse, compare, combine and select information and present alternative procedures in research and development processes.
They are able to analyse, reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently, responsibly and with initiative. They can work as a member of a group promoting and developing the group's activities to achieve common goals. They are able to critically apply ethical principles in their work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use fundamental research and development concepts systematically.
They are able to describe various research and development processes and justify related solutions. The students are able to analyse completed research. They are able to select appropriate research and development procedures based on acquired knowledge. They are able to reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently and responsibly. They can work as a member of a group to achieve common goals. They are able to justify their work according to ethical principles

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The students are able to use appropriate research and development concepts. They are able to describe the main features of the research and development process in general. The students are able to describe a piece of completed research.
They are able to systematically plan the implementation of method(s) used in a research and development process, though some uncertainty may be apparent. The students are able to use appropriate research and development methods under super vision. They can work as a member of a group taking responsibility for their own actions and other group members into account.

Assessment methods and criteria

Määrällinen tutkimus (2 op) (Arviointi: 0-5)
-Tentti

Laadullinen tutkimus (3 op) (Arviointi: 0-5)
-Laadullinen tutkimustehtävä
-Kyselytutkimuksen laatiminen
-Tutkimusraportti

Kurssin arvosana lasketaan painotetun keskiarvon mukaan määrällisen ja laadullisen tutkimuksen arvosanojen pohjalta.
Tarkemmat arviointiperusteet eri tehtävien osalta on ilmoitettu Moodlessa.

Objective

Students will possess the basic ability to develop their expertise in order to carry out different research and development projects, while understanding how they add to their expertise. They will be able to critically assess knowledge generated by research and development work.

Content

Basis of research and development
Qualitative research process
Quantitative research process
Research material analysis and interpretation

Location and time

Kajaani syksy 2023

Materials

Kirjallisuus on ilmoitettu Moodlessa.

Teaching methods

Opetus toteutetaan lähiopetuksena.

Exam schedules

Tenttien ajankohdat ilmoitetaan Moodlessa.

Completion alternatives

AHOT tarkastellaan tapauskohtaisesti.

Student workload

5 op itsenäistä työtä eli 135 tuntia opiskelutyötä.

Content scheduling

Tutkimuksellinen ja toiminnallinen opinnäytetyö: AMK-opinnäytetyön analysointi 1,5 op (Anne)
Tutkimus- ja kehittämistoiminnan menetelmät: 1 op (Anne)
Laadullisen aineiston analysointi 0,5 op (Anne)
Määrällinen tutkimus (2 op) (Aki)

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The students are able to use research and development concepts in a variety of ways and with expertise.
They are able to analyse and critically assess completed research.
The students are able to analyse, compare, combine and select information and present alternative procedures in research and development processes.
They are able to analyse, reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently, responsibly and with initiative. They can work as a member of a group promoting and developing the group's activities to achieve common goals. They are able to critically apply ethical principles in their work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use fundamental research and development concepts systematically.
They are able to describe various research and development processes and justify related solutions. The students are able to analyse completed research. They are able to select appropriate research and development procedures based on acquired knowledge. They are able to reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently and responsibly. They can work as a member of a group to achieve common goals. They are able to justify their work according to ethical principles

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The students are able to use appropriate research and development concepts. They are able to describe the main features of the research and development process in general. The students are able to describe a piece of completed research.
They are able to systematically plan the implementation of method(s) used in a research and development process, though some uncertainty may be apparent. The students are able to use appropriate research and development methods under super vision. They can work as a member of a group taking responsibility for their own actions and other group members into account.

Assessment methods and criteria

Tutkimuksellinen ja toiminnallinen opinnäytetyö: AMK-opinnäytetyön analyysitehtävä HYV/HYL
Tutkimus- ja kehittämistoiminnan menetelmät: tentti (arviointi 0-5)
Laadullinen aineiston analyysi HYV/HYL
Määrällinen tutkimus: tentti (arviointi: 0-5)
Tarkempi arviointi on Moodlessa.

Objective

Students will possess the basic ability to develop their expertise in order to carry out different research and development projects, while understanding how they add to their expertise. They will be able to critically assess knowledge generated by research and development work.

Content

Basis of research and development
Qualitative research process
Quantitative research process
Research material analysis and interpretation

Further information

Opintojaksosta on oltava suoritettuna vähintään 3 op ennen oman opinnäytetyösuunnitelman hyväksymistä.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The students are able to use research and development concepts in a variety of ways and with expertise.
They are able to analyse and critically assess completed research.
The students are able to analyse, compare, combine and select information and present alternative procedures in research and development processes.
They are able to analyse, reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently, responsibly and with initiative. They can work as a member of a group promoting and developing the group's activities to achieve common goals. They are able to critically apply ethical principles in their work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use fundamental research and development concepts systematically.
They are able to describe various research and development processes and justify related solutions. The students are able to analyse completed research. They are able to select appropriate research and development procedures based on acquired knowledge. They are able to reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently and responsibly. They can work as a member of a group to achieve common goals. They are able to justify their work according to ethical principles

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The students are able to use appropriate research and development concepts. They are able to describe the main features of the research and development process in general. The students are able to describe a piece of completed research.
They are able to systematically plan the implementation of method(s) used in a research and development process, though some uncertainty may be apparent. The students are able to use appropriate research and development methods under super vision. They can work as a member of a group taking responsibility for their own actions and other group members into account.

Objective

Students will possess the basic ability to develop their expertise in order to carry out different research and development projects, while understanding how they add to their expertise. They will be able to critically assess knowledge generated by research and development work.

Content

Basis of research and development
Qualitative research process
Quantitative research process
Research material analysis and interpretation

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The students are able to use research and development concepts in a variety of ways and with expertise.
They are able to analyse and critically assess completed research.
The students are able to analyse, compare, combine and select information and present alternative procedures in research and development processes.
They are able to analyse, reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently, responsibly and with initiative. They can work as a member of a group promoting and developing the group's activities to achieve common goals. They are able to critically apply ethical principles in their work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use fundamental research and development concepts systematically.
They are able to describe various research and development processes and justify related solutions. The students are able to analyse completed research. They are able to select appropriate research and development procedures based on acquired knowledge. They are able to reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently and responsibly. They can work as a member of a group to achieve common goals. They are able to justify their work according to ethical principles

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The students are able to use appropriate research and development concepts. They are able to describe the main features of the research and development process in general. The students are able to describe a piece of completed research.
They are able to systematically plan the implementation of method(s) used in a research and development process, though some uncertainty may be apparent. The students are able to use appropriate research and development methods under super vision. They can work as a member of a group taking responsibility for their own actions and other group members into account.

Objective

Students will possess the basic ability to develop their expertise in order to carry out different research and development projects, while understanding how they add to their expertise. They will be able to critically assess knowledge generated by research and development work.

Content

Basis of research and development
Qualitative research process
Quantitative research process
Research material analysis and interpretation

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The students are able to use research and development concepts in a variety of ways and with expertise.
They are able to analyse and critically assess completed research.
The students are able to analyse, compare, combine and select information and present alternative procedures in research and development processes.
They are able to analyse, reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently, responsibly and with initiative. They can work as a member of a group promoting and developing the group's activities to achieve common goals. They are able to critically apply ethical principles in their work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use fundamental research and development concepts systematically.
They are able to describe various research and development processes and justify related solutions. The students are able to analyse completed research. They are able to select appropriate research and development procedures based on acquired knowledge. They are able to reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently and responsibly. They can work as a member of a group to achieve common goals. They are able to justify their work according to ethical principles

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The students are able to use appropriate research and development concepts. They are able to describe the main features of the research and development process in general. The students are able to describe a piece of completed research.
They are able to systematically plan the implementation of method(s) used in a research and development process, though some uncertainty may be apparent. The students are able to use appropriate research and development methods under super vision. They can work as a member of a group taking responsibility for their own actions and other group members into account.

Objective

Students will possess the basic ability to develop their expertise in order to carry out different research and development projects, while understanding how they add to their expertise. They will be able to critically assess knowledge generated by research and development work.

Content

Basis of research and development
Qualitative research process
Quantitative research process
Research material analysis and interpretation

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The students are able to use research and development concepts in a variety of ways and with expertise.
They are able to analyse and critically assess completed research.
The students are able to analyse, compare, combine and select information and present alternative procedures in research and development processes.
They are able to analyse, reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently, responsibly and with initiative. They can work as a member of a group promoting and developing the group's activities to achieve common goals. They are able to critically apply ethical principles in their work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use fundamental research and development concepts systematically.
They are able to describe various research and development processes and justify related solutions. The students are able to analyse completed research. They are able to select appropriate research and development procedures based on acquired knowledge. They are able to reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently and responsibly. They can work as a member of a group to achieve common goals. They are able to justify their work according to ethical principles

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The students are able to use appropriate research and development concepts. They are able to describe the main features of the research and development process in general. The students are able to describe a piece of completed research.
They are able to systematically plan the implementation of method(s) used in a research and development process, though some uncertainty may be apparent. The students are able to use appropriate research and development methods under super vision. They can work as a member of a group taking responsibility for their own actions and other group members into account.

Objective

Students will possess the basic ability to develop their expertise in order to carry out different research and development projects, while understanding how they add to their expertise. They will be able to critically assess knowledge generated by research and development work.

Content

Basis of research and development
Qualitative research process
Quantitative research process
Research material analysis and interpretation

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The students are able to use research and development concepts in a variety of ways and with expertise.
They are able to analyse and critically assess completed research.
The students are able to analyse, compare, combine and select information and present alternative procedures in research and development processes.
They are able to analyse, reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently, responsibly and with initiative. They can work as a member of a group promoting and developing the group's activities to achieve common goals. They are able to critically apply ethical principles in their work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use fundamental research and development concepts systematically.
They are able to describe various research and development processes and justify related solutions. The students are able to analyse completed research. They are able to select appropriate research and development procedures based on acquired knowledge. They are able to reflect upon and critically assess their own competence.
The students are able to work independently and responsibly. They can work as a member of a group to achieve common goals. They are able to justify their work according to ethical principles

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The students are able to use appropriate research and development concepts. They are able to describe the main features of the research and development process in general. The students are able to describe a piece of completed research.
They are able to systematically plan the implementation of method(s) used in a research and development process, though some uncertainty may be apparent. The students are able to use appropriate research and development methods under super vision. They can work as a member of a group taking responsibility for their own actions and other group members into account.