Tourism Operational EnvironmentLaajuus (5 cr)
Code: AB00CU31
Credits
5 op
Teaching language
- English
Objective
The students are able to describe the differences between tourism regions in Finland and how pull factors (attractions) differ in various parts of the country. Using research material, they will be able to describe how foreign tourists spend their time in Finland and where tourists go abroad.
Content
Finland as a tourist destination
Tourism regions in Finland their key pull factors
International tourism into Finland and from Finland abroad
The world tourism region
Tourism of the future
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The students can extensively and comprehensively identify the tourism regions of Finland and their key differences and can extensively describe how Finland is divided into tourism regions and the pull factors of these regions. They are able to extensively describe and analyse tourist behaviour using research. The students are able to connect the tourism programme service sector to form a tourism cluster. The students are able to determine which nature, sports, culture and wellbeing tourism programme service modes of service are suitable for different regions of Finland. The students are able to work as members of a group to further and develop the work of the team and can critically apply professional ethical principles in their work.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The students can identify well the tourism regions of Finland and their key differences and can describe in detail how Finland is divided into tourism regions and the pull factors of these regions. They are able to describe and analyse tourist behaviour well using research. The students are able define and describe the programme service sector. The students are able to define and describe the special features of nature, sports, culture, adventure and wellbeing tourism programme services. The students are able to work as members of a group to achieve common goals and they are able to justify their work according to professional ethical principles.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The students can identify the tourism regions of Finland and their key differences and can describe to a shallow degree how Finland is divided into tourism regions and the pull factors of these regions. They are able to describe and analyse to a satisfactory degree tourist behaviour using research. The students are able classify nature tourism (key summer activities: hiking, Nordic walking, cycling, horse riding, wildlife, canoeing, and fishing; key winter activities: skiing, snowshoeing, winter fishing), sports and exercise tourism (active and passive), adventure tourism (different levels of adventure), culture tourism (empowerment and resources offered by culture) and wellbeing tourism (wellbeing tourism in the field of health tourism) programme services. The students are able to work as members of a group taking others into account and they are able to work according to professional ethical principles.
Enrollment
30.12.2024 - 26.01.2025
Timing
01.01.2025 - 31.05.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Business
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Bachelor’s Degree in Tourism
Teachers
- Eljas Johansson
- Peter Stricker
Groups
-
ATA25KATA25K
Objective
The students are able to describe the differences between tourism regions in Finland and how pull factors (attractions) differ in various parts of the country. Using research material, they will be able to describe how foreign tourists spend their time in Finland and where tourists go abroad.
Content
Finland as a tourist destination
Tourism regions in Finland their key pull factors
International tourism into Finland and from Finland abroad
The world tourism region
Tourism of the future
Evaluation scale
0 - 5
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The students can extensively and comprehensively identify the tourism regions of Finland and their key differences and can extensively describe how Finland is divided into tourism regions and the pull factors of these regions. They are able to extensively describe and analyse tourist behaviour using research. The students are able to connect the tourism programme service sector to form a tourism cluster. The students are able to determine which nature, sports, culture and wellbeing tourism programme service modes of service are suitable for different regions of Finland. The students are able to work as members of a group to further and develop the work of the team and can critically apply professional ethical principles in their work.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The students can identify well the tourism regions of Finland and their key differences and can describe in detail how Finland is divided into tourism regions and the pull factors of these regions. They are able to describe and analyse tourist behaviour well using research. The students are able define and describe the programme service sector. The students are able to define and describe the special features of nature, sports, culture, adventure and wellbeing tourism programme services. The students are able to work as members of a group to achieve common goals and they are able to justify their work according to professional ethical principles.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The students can identify the tourism regions of Finland and their key differences and can describe to a shallow degree how Finland is divided into tourism regions and the pull factors of these regions. They are able to describe and analyse to a satisfactory degree tourist behaviour using research. The students are able classify nature tourism (key summer activities: hiking, Nordic walking, cycling, horse riding, wildlife, canoeing, and fishing; key winter activities: skiing, snowshoeing, winter fishing), sports and exercise tourism (active and passive), adventure tourism (different levels of adventure), culture tourism (empowerment and resources offered by culture) and wellbeing tourism (wellbeing tourism in the field of health tourism) programme services. The students are able to work as members of a group taking others into account and they are able to work according to professional ethical principles.