Study Guide

Objective

Students will be able to use CAD's 3-D applications for product modelling purposes.

Content

An introduction to 3-dimensional modelling
Visualisation
Producing drawings
Compositions
Features modelling
Sheet metal products
The Mathematics of Modelling
3D printing

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Return of learning assignments
Self-assessment
Course feedback

Qualifications

Technical Drawing, CAD design

Further information

1 RDI point

Objective

Students will be able to use CAD's 3-D applications for product modelling purposes.

Content

An introduction to 3-dimensional modelling
Visualisation
Producing drawings
Compositions
Features modelling
Sheet metal products
The Mathematics of Modelling
3D printing

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Return of learning assignments
Self-assessment
Course feedback

Qualifications

Technical Drawing, CAD design

Further information

1 RDI point

Objective

Students will be able to use CAD's 3-D applications for product modelling purposes.

Content

An introduction to 3-dimensional modelling
Visualisation
Producing drawings
Compositions
Features modelling
Sheet metal products
The Mathematics of Modelling
3D printing

Materials

Opettajan osoittama materiaali

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Return of learning assignments
Self-assessment
Course feedback

Qualifications

Technical Drawing, CAD design

Further information

1 RDI point

Objective

Students will gain wide-ranging knowledge of 3 D CAD software for use in design.

Content

User interface
Partial modelling
Creating drawings from a 3 D model
Assembly drawings, limitations, adaptability and collision checks
Assembly animations
Parameters and integration, product family
Sheet metal design

Materials

Opettajan osoittama materiaali

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Harjoitustyön palauttaminen
Itsearviointi
Opintojaksopalaute

Qualifications

3D Modelling

Further information

3D Modelling Continuation Course

Objective

Students will gain wide-ranging knowledge of 3 D CAD software for use in design.

Content

User interface
Partial modelling
Creating drawings from a 3 D model
Assembly drawings, limitations, adaptability and collision checks
Assembly animations
Parameters and integration, product family
Sheet metal design

Materials

Opettajan osoittama materiaali

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Harjoitustyön palauttaminen
Itsearviointi
Opintojaksopalaute

Qualifications

3D Modelling

Further information

3D Modelling Continuation Course

Objective

Students will gain wide-ranging knowledge of 3 D CAD software for use in design.

Content

User interface
Partial modelling
Creating drawings from a 3 D model
Assembly drawings, limitations, adaptability and collision checks
Assembly animations
Parameters and integration, product family
Sheet metal design

Materials

Opettajan osoittama materiaali

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Harjoitustyön palauttaminen
Itsearviointi
Opintojaksopalaute

Qualifications

3D Modelling

Further information

3D Modelling Continuation Course

Objective

Students will gain wide-ranging knowledge of 3 D CAD software for use in design.

Content

User interface
Partial modelling
Creating drawings from a 3 D model
Assembly drawings, limitations, adaptability and collision checks
Assembly animations
Parameters and integration, product family
Sheet metal design

Materials

Opettajan osoittama materiaali

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Harjoitustyön palauttaminen
Itsearviointi
Opintojaksopalaute

Qualifications

3D Modelling

Further information

3D Modelling Continuation Course

Objective

The student understands the Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Teams software programs and can use them independently in her/his studies and working life in a professional manner.

Content

The scope of the two credits covers the Basic and Advanced levels of the Office software.

Basic:
- Basics of word processing
- Basics of spreadsheet calculation
- Basics of slideshows
- Teams and meeting participation

Advanced:
- Long documents
- Advanced use of Excel
- The keys to a good show

Location and time

Syksy 2023

Materials

Verkkomateriaali on saatavilla kurssialustalla.

Teaching methods

Independent online studies on the Edukamu course platform.

Exam schedules

Uusinta (tehtävien suoritus loppuun) on mahdollista myöhemmillä kurssitoteutuksilla. Ohjaava opettaja ohjaa opiskelijan sopivalle toteutukselle.

Completion alternatives

Office-ohjelmien AHOT on mahdollista työelämäprojektien tai ohjaavan opettajan tehtävien kautta.

Student workload

Tehtäviin on hyvä varata aikaa noin 2-4h per tehtävä. Materiaali on kattavaa ja helppolukuista mutta sitä on runsaasti. Office-ohjelmien aikaisempi osaaminen nopeuttaa opintojakson suorittamista mutta aloittelijan on hyvä varautua käyttämään enemmän aikaa.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Opiskelija palauttaa kaikki kuusi tehtävää hyväksytysti. Tehtävän hyväksytty suoritus vaatii myös palautteessa mahdollisesti ilmenevät korjaukset.

Content scheduling

Alkuinfo yhteisesti koko ryhmälle jonka jälkeen itsenäistä opiskelua.

Further information

Tarvitaan Office-yhteensopiva tietokone (ei puhelin tai tabletti). Opiskelijoilla on käytössään korkeakoulun Microsoft-lisenssi jolla ohjelmat saa asennettua ja aktivoitua omille laitteille.

Evaluation scale

Hylätty/Hyväksytty

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student returns all six assignments with approval. The approved performance of the task also requires corrections that may appear in the feedback.

Further information

The student receives registration instructions for the online course by email.

Objective

The student understands the Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Teams software programs and can use them independently in her/his studies and working life in a professional manner.

Content

The scope of the two credits covers the Basic and Advanced levels of the Office software.

Basic:
- Basics of word processing
- Basics of spreadsheet calculation
- Basics of slideshows
- Teams and meeting participation

Advanced:
- Long documents
- Advanced use of Excel
- The keys to a good show

Location and time

Syksy 2023

Materials

Verkkomateriaali on saatavilla kurssialustalla.

Teaching methods

Independent online studies on the Edukamu course platform.

Exam schedules

Uusinta (tehtävien suoritus loppuun) on mahdollista myöhemmillä kurssitoteutuksilla. Ohjaava opettaja ohjaa opiskelijan sopivalle toteutukselle.

Completion alternatives

Office-ohjelmien AHOT on mahdollista työelämäprojektien tai ohjaavan opettajan tehtävien kautta.

Student workload

Tehtäviin on hyvä varata aikaa noin 2-4h per tehtävä. Materiaali on kattavaa ja helppolukuista mutta sitä on runsaasti. Office-ohjelmien aikaisempi osaaminen nopeuttaa opintojakson suorittamista mutta aloittelijan on hyvä varautua käyttämään enemmän aikaa.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Opiskelija palauttaa kaikki kuusi tehtävää hyväksytysti. Tehtävän hyväksytty suoritus vaatii myös palautteessa mahdollisesti ilmenevät korjaukset.

Content scheduling

Alkuinfo yhteisesti koko ryhmälle jonka jälkeen itsenäistä opiskelua.

Further information

Tarvitaan Office-yhteensopiva tietokone (ei puhelin tai tabletti). Opiskelijoilla on käytössään korkeakoulun Microsoft-lisenssi jolla ohjelmat saa asennettua ja aktivoitua omille laitteille.

Evaluation scale

Hylätty/Hyväksytty

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student returns all six assignments with approval. The approved performance of the task also requires corrections that may appear in the feedback.

Further information

The student receives registration instructions for the online course by email.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Objective

Students will know the basics of thermal engineering, energy sources, production and use and saving energy.

Content

Content of studies

• Energy in industry and society
• The production of energy
• Fuels and combustion
• Water vapor
• Energy/heat transfer technologies
• Electricity distribution network
• The sensible use of energy

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students possess a versatile understanding of energy transfer chain operations and how energy can be used sustainably.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to carry out heat transfer calculations and understand related practical procedures and technical solutions.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are familiar with the principles of heat transfer and have some perception of global energy supplies. They know the electricity production process and how it works.

Further information

1 RDI point

Objective

Students will know the basics of thermal engineering, energy sources, production and use and saving energy.

Content

Content of studies

• Energy in industry and society
• The production of energy
• Fuels and combustion
• Water vapor
• Energy/heat transfer technologies
• Electricity distribution network
• The sensible use of energy

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students possess a versatile understanding of energy transfer chain operations and how energy can be used sustainably.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to carry out heat transfer calculations and understand related practical procedures and technical solutions.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are familiar with the principles of heat transfer and have some perception of global energy supplies. They know the electricity production process and how it works.

Further information

1 RDI point

Objective

Students will know the basics of thermal engineering, energy sources, production and use and saving energy.

Content

Heat transfer
Energy supply
The production of energy
The sensible use of energy

Location and time

Opintojakso suoritetaan verkossa. Opetusta verkossa on:
- 8.1.2024 klo 17-20.15
- 15.1.2024 klo 17-20.15
- 22.1.2024 klo 17-20.15
- 29.1.2024 klo 17-20.15
- 5.2.2024 klo 17-20.15
- 12.2.2024 klo 17-20.15
- 19.2.2024 klo 17-20.15
- 26.2.2024 klo 17-20.15

Materials

Material available in the course

Course literature to support studying, e.g.
Jarmo Perttula - Energiatekniikka
Mikko Hupa et. al. - Poltto ja palaminen

Teaching methods

Opintojakso suoritetaan KAMKin tutkinto-opiskelijoiden monimuotoryhmän mukana. Opintojakso suoritetaan verkossa (Microsoft Teams).

Student workload

Opintojakso on laajudeltaan 3 opintopistettä. 3 opintopistettä vastaa noin 81 tuntia opiskelijan työtä (1 op = 27 h).

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students possess a versatile understanding of energy transfer chain operations and how energy can be used sustainably.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to carry out heat transfer calculations and understand related practical procedures and technical solutions.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are familiar with the principles of heat transfer and have some perception of global energy supplies. They know the electricity production process and how it works.

Objective

Mechanical and production engineering students will be able to read professional texts linked to their area of engineering and write technical documents.
The student understands the requirements and effects of global environment in the field of mechanical and production engineering (getting familiar with ISO standards in English).
The student understands the central concepts and terminology within the field of mechanical and production engineering.
The student is able to communicate in English in an international working life.

Content

Technical English as a tool
Applying for work
Structural features of technical English
Building vocabulary for own field of engineering (ISO standards)
Developing reading techniques
Telephoning
Presentation of a company, product, manual or service

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to apply and adapt their language to the needs of working life when writing and speaking using the vocabulary of their field, topics related to current content and versatile sentence structures. The students are proficient in the fundamental terminology of their field and can write about and discuss themes concerning their field of study using the correct terminology. The students' pronunciation and articulation is clear.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to produce sentences of basic structure in everyday and working life when writing and speaking. The students recognise and are able to use the fundamental terminology of their field and their pronunciation and articulation is mainly clear, though errors occur.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to produce sentences of simple structure in everyday and working life when writing and speaking though pronunciation and grammar errors occur. The students recognise the fundamental terminology of their field.

Qualifications

European language assessment framework level B2

Further information

JABÄ 4.1.2023

Objective

Mechanical and production engineering students will be able to read professional texts linked to their area of engineering and write technical documents.
The student understands the requirements and effects of global environment in the field of mechanical and production engineering (getting familiar with ISO standards in English).
The student understands the central concepts and terminology within the field of mechanical and production engineering.
The student is able to communicate in English in an international working life.

Content

Technical English as a tool
Applying for work
Structural features of technical English
Building vocabulary for own field of engineering (ISO standards)
Developing reading techniques
Telephoning
Presentation of a company, product, manual or service

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to apply and adapt their language to the needs of working life when writing and speaking using the vocabulary of their field, topics related to current content and versatile sentence structures. The students are proficient in the fundamental terminology of their field and can write about and discuss themes concerning their field of study using the correct terminology. The students' pronunciation and articulation is clear.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to produce sentences of basic structure in everyday and working life when writing and speaking. The students recognise and are able to use the fundamental terminology of their field and their pronunciation and articulation is mainly clear, though errors occur.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to produce sentences of simple structure in everyday and working life when writing and speaking though pronunciation and grammar errors occur. The students recognise the fundamental terminology of their field.

Qualifications

European language assessment framework level B2

Further information

JABÄ 4.1.2023

Objective

Students will know the principles of the FEM and FEM calculations using application programmes.

Content

Principles of the Finite Element Method.
The stages of FEM calculation.
Exercises

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to use professional concepts with expertise and can apply their professional competence as required in different situations. They are able to select the best possible and available calculation parameters for the situation. They are able to analyse and simulate structures and to develop systematic methods and calculation instructions for FEM analysis.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use a wide range of professional concepts fluently and are able to assess the suitability of methods for different situations in various operational environments. They are able to apply FEM calculation methods to achieve optimal structural solutions.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students know the basic of FEM and can use analysis software to analyse simple structures. They are aware of the significance of the software's limitations and can verify results produced by the Software.

Qualifications

Strength of Materials

Further information

3 RDI points

Objective

Students will know the principles of the FEM and FEM calculations using application programmes.

Content

Principles of the Finite Element Method.
The stages of FEM calculation.
Exercises

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to use professional concepts with expertise and can apply their professional competence as required in different situations. They are able to select the best possible and available calculation parameters for the situation. They are able to analyse and simulate structures and to develop systematic methods and calculation instructions for FEM analysis.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use a wide range of professional concepts fluently and are able to assess the suitability of methods for different situations in various operational environments. They are able to apply FEM calculation methods to achieve optimal structural solutions.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students know the basic of FEM and can use analysis software to analyse simple structures. They are aware of the significance of the software's limitations and can verify results produced by the Software.

Qualifications

Strength of Materials

Further information

3 RDI points

Objective

Students will become conversant with basic physics through experimentation. The course also covers measurement technology and written reporting.

Content

Completion of laboratory work and written reporting.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to analyse the problems in hand and produce alternative methods of solving them.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to draw conclusions from the problems in hand. They are able to divide problem solving into suitable parts.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

All measurements are conducted according to the instructions. The students are able to find suitable equations in the solutions to problems.

Further information

TKI- pisteet 3

Objective

Students will become conversant with basic physics through experimentation. The course also covers measurement technology and written reporting.

Content

Completion of laboratory work and written reporting.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to analyse the problems in hand and produce alternative methods of solving them.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to draw conclusions from the problems in hand. They are able to divide problem solving into suitable parts.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

All measurements are conducted according to the instructions. The students are able to find suitable equations in the solutions to problems.

Further information

TKI- pisteet 3

Objective

Students will become conversant with basic physics through experimentation. The course also covers measurement technology and written reporting.

Content

Completion of laboratory work and written reporting.

Materials

We will announce it during the course.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to analyse the problems in hand and produce alternative methods of solving them.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to draw conclusions from the problems in hand. They are able to divide problem solving into suitable parts.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

All measurements are conducted according to the instructions. The students are able to find suitable equations in the solutions to problems.

Further information

TKI- pisteet 3

Objective

Students will become conversant with basic physics through experimentation. The course also covers measurement technology and written reporting.

Content

Completion of laboratory work and written reporting.

Materials

We will announce it during the course.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to analyse the problems in hand and produce alternative methods of solving them.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to draw conclusions from the problems in hand. They are able to divide problem solving into suitable parts.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

All measurements are conducted according to the instructions. The students are able to find suitable equations in the solutions to problems.

Further information

TKI- pisteet 3

Content

• Fysiikan suure- ja yksikköjärjestelmä
• suoraviivainen liike
• lämpölaajeneminen
• lämpöenergia
• ideaalikaasun tilayhtälö

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to analyse problems posed by the topic in hand and produce alternative methods of solving them.

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

The students are able to draw conclusions from the problems of the topic in hand producing solutions based on them using systematic methods.

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

The students can indentify the quantities and units of the topic in
hand and are able to use related methods to solve problems.

Objective

Students will be competent in physics required in other courses organised in the school of engineering.

Content

Quantities and unit systems of physics
Motion theory, motion power theory
Work, power and energy
Linear momentum and quantity of motion
Circular and spinning motion
The mechanics of fluids and gases

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to analyse mechanical problems and produce alternative methods of solving them.
A commendable level requires that you get more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to draw conclusions from the mechanical problems. They are able to divide problem solving into suitable parts and do secondary level equations and systems of equations.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students recognise mechanical quantities and units. The students are able to find suitable equations for solving mechanical problems and are proficient in using the required linear equations to solve them.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Objective

Students will be competent in physics required in other courses organised in the school of engineering.

Content

Quantities and unit systems of physics
Motion theory, motion power theory
Work, power and energy
Linear momentum and quantity of motion
Circular and spinning motion
The mechanics of fluids and gases

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to analyse mechanical problems and produce alternative methods of solving them.
A commendable level requires that you get more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to draw conclusions from the mechanical problems. They are able to divide problem solving into suitable parts and do secondary level equations and systems of equations.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students recognise mechanical quantities and units. The students are able to find suitable equations for solving mechanical problems and are proficient in using the required linear equations to solve them.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Objective

Students will know the physical background required in other courses in the school of engineering.

Content

Thermodynamics
Vibration
Wave motion
Acoustics
Optics
Direct current circuit

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to analyse the problems of the topic in hand and produce alternative methods of solving them.
A commendable level requires that you get more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to draw conclusions from the problems of the topic in hand. They are able to divide problem solving into suitable parts to solve related equations and system of equations.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to recognise the topic's (thermodynamics, electronics and wave motion theory) and quantities and units. They are able to find the equations needed to solve problems within the topic area and can do the required linear equations.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Qualifications

Physics 1

Objective

Students will know the physical background required in other courses in the school of engineering.

Content

Thermodynamics
Vibration
Wave motion
Acoustics
Optics
Direct current circuit

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to analyse the problems of the topic in hand and produce alternative methods of solving them.
A commendable level requires that you get more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to draw conclusions from the problems of the topic in hand. They are able to divide problem solving into suitable parts to solve related equations and system of equations.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to recognise the topic's (thermodynamics, electronics and wave motion theory) and quantities and units. They are able to find the equations needed to solve problems within the topic area and can do the required linear equations.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Qualifications

Physics 1

Objective

Students will know the physical background required in other courses in the school of engineering.

Content

Thermodynamics
Vibration
Wave motion
Acoustics
Optics
Direct current circuit

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to analyse the problems of the topic in hand and produce alternative methods of solving them.
A commendable level requires that you get more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to draw conclusions from the problems of the topic in hand. They are able to divide problem solving into suitable parts to solve related equations and system of equations.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to recognise the topic's (thermodynamics, electronics and wave motion theory) and quantities and units. They are able to find the equations needed to solve problems within the topic area and can do the required linear equations.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Qualifications

Physics 1

Objective

The aim of the practical training period is to provide students with good post graduation employment opportunities and to familiarise students with working life. Students will gain knowledge of different job tasks, working procedures, devices and professional terminology related to their chosen specialism in a real working environment under supervision. The practical training period takes place during the autumn semester of the fourth study year. The practical training co-ordinator is responsible for informing students of practical training issues together with the head of the degree programme.

Content

A continuous approx five month training period in working life

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

To be announced

Qualifications

Students must have 135 cr before starting their practical training period.

Further information

15 RDI credits/points

Objective

The aim of the practical training period is to provide students with good post graduation employment opportunities and to familiarise students with working life. Students will gain knowledge of different job tasks, working procedures, devices and professional terminology related to their chosen specialism in a real working environment under supervision. The practical training period takes place during the autumn semester of the fourth study year. The practical training co-ordinator is responsible for informing students of practical training issues together with the head of the degree programme.

Content

A continuous approx five month training period in working life

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

To be announced

Qualifications

Students must have 135 cr before starting their practical training period.

Further information

15 RDI credits/points

Objective

This course gives the information about the climate change: the phenomenon, impacts and the solutions for the mitigation.

Content

Phenomenon
Greenhouse gases and their concentrations
Rise of the global temperature and it's impact
The need for emission reductions
Solutions for the mitigation

Materials

Verkko-opintojakson yhteydessä tutustuttavaksi tuleva materiaali.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The exercises/questions are within the online course.

Qualifications

Toisen asteen opinnot luonnontieteistä

Further information

Unfortunately this course is only available in Finnish.

Objective

Mechanical and production engineering students will develop their intercultural competence so that they are able to recognise cultural differences, understand them and adapt their communication style as required. They will apply their international communication competence and deepen their abilities to work in international and multicultural working life situations involving spoken and written interaction in English.

Content

Concepts of culture and communication
Variables for comparing cultures
Cultural differences in communication
The process of adapting to a culture
Presentation of a company, production and products
Telephone conversations
Written communication
Meeting and negotiations

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to recognise the main theories and principles of intercultural communication. They are able to discuss and write about related themes using the correct terminology. Their pronunciation and intonation is clear and they are able to plan and implement a comprehensive and natural presentation on a topic related to their field.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to recognise some of the main theories and principles of intercultural communication. They are able to recognise and use basic terminology of the field. Their pronunciation and intonation is to some extent clear though containing errors and they are able to plan and implement a presentation on a topic related to their field.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to recognise the basic terminology of the field. They able to communicate on intercultural issues in writing and orally to some degree. Their pronunciation and intonation is weak. They are able to deliver a presentation of some sort with help on the topic in hand.

Qualifications

European assessment framework B2:
Proficiency test and Build up Your English course if necessary

Further information

KOOU 12.12.2013

Objective

KAMKstart konetekniikan -opinnoissa suoritetaan opinnot, jotka ovat osa Kajaanin ammattikorkeakoulun konetekniikan insinööriopintoja.

Suorittamalla KAMKstart konetekniikka -opinnot 15 op, saat oikeuden hakea Kajaanin ammattikorkeakoulun erillishaussa konetekniikan insinööritutkintokoulutukseen.

Content

Tämä KAMKstart opintokokonaisuus auttaa toisen asteen opiskelijoita saamaan paremman käsityksen konetekniikan insinöörikoulutuksesta sekä antaa valmiuksia ammattikorkeakouluopintoihin. KAMKstart opintokokonaisuus tarjoaa mahdollisuuden oman kiinnostuksen syventämiseen konetekniikan alalla.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Further information

KAMKstart opinnot on tarkoitettu vain toisen asteen opiskelijoille. Ennen KAMKstart opintoihin ilmoittautumista, keskustelethan suoritettavista opinnoista toisen asteen opinto-ohjaajasi kanssa.

Huomiothan myös, sinun tulee liittää toisen asteen opiskelutodistus ilmoittautumislomakkeelle.

Objective

The student gets a practical feel for project organization and management, using advanced project management tools. The student understands what the project consists of and what matters are related to working in the project and managing it. The student can outline the phases of project-based activities, understand the related terminology, and can assess any risks related to the project. The student completes project work in which the learned knowledge is applied in a practical research or development task.

Content

A research or development task defined by the customer, where the use of modern software is applied in the organization of operations and/or the solution of a problem.

The project:
- Organizational models
- Design and implementation
- Risk analysis
- Documentation / communication during the project
- Conclusion and follow-up

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student participates in project-based activities. The student knows how to consistently use the concepts of project activities. The student understands the procedures, techniques and models related to project activities, and is able to map the risks associated with them. The student knows how to evaluate his/ her skills and has an attitude towards teamwork in relation to the rest of the project team. The student can act independently and commit to the project's goals, yet as a full-fledged member of the project team. The student is ready to present the achievements of the project in relation to the set goals.

Qualifications

Mineral Excavation and Mining Engineering
Particle and Beneficiation Engineering

Objective

The student gets a practical feel for project organization and management, using advanced project management tools. The student understands what the project consists of and what matters are related to working in the project and managing it. The student can outline the phases of project-based activities, understand the related terminology, and can assess any risks related to the project. The student completes project work in which the learned knowledge is applied in a practical research or development task.

Content

A research or development task defined by the customer, where the use of modern software is applied in the organization of operations and/or the solution of a problem.

The project:
- Organizational models
- Design and implementation
- Risk analysis
- Documentation / communication during the project
- Conclusion and follow-up

Materials

Ilmoitetaan kurssin alussa.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student participates in project-based activities. The student knows how to consistently use the concepts of project activities. The student understands the procedures, techniques and models related to project activities, and is able to map the risks associated with them. The student knows how to evaluate his/ her skills and has an attitude towards teamwork in relation to the rest of the project team. The student can act independently and commit to the project's goals, yet as a full-fledged member of the project team. The student is ready to present the achievements of the project in relation to the set goals.

Qualifications

Mineral Excavation and Mining Engineering
Particle and Beneficiation Engineering

Objective

The student gets a practical feel for project organization and management, using advanced project management tools. The student understands what the project consists of and what matters are related to working in the project and managing it. The student can outline the phases of project-based activities, understand the related terminology, and can assess any risks related to the project. The student completes project work in which the learned knowledge is applied in a practical research or development task.

Content

A research or development task defined by the customer, where the use of modern software is applied in the organization of operations and/or the solution of a problem.

The project:
- Organizational models
- Design and implementation
- Risk analysis
- Documentation / communication during the project
- Conclusion and follow-up

Materials

We will announce it during the course.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student participates in project-based activities. The student knows how to consistently use the concepts of project activities. The student understands the procedures, techniques and models related to project activities, and is able to map the risks associated with them. The student knows how to evaluate his/ her skills and has an attitude towards teamwork in relation to the rest of the project team. The student can act independently and commit to the project's goals, yet as a full-fledged member of the project team. The student is ready to present the achievements of the project in relation to the set goals.

Qualifications

Mineral Excavation and Mining Engineering
Particle and Beneficiation Engineering

Objective

The student knows the key laws and regulations governing the mining sector and learns aspects related to working conditions, work methods and the safe use of machines. In addition, he knows the permits and inspections required for different jobs.

Content

Mining Act, regulations of the State Council and the Ministry of Labor and the Economy. Occupational Safety Act and Regulation. The Health Care Act and some decisions of the Government. Workplace safety notices. Licensed works. Physical and psychological occupational health and safety. Occupational health care arrangements. Manager's responsibilities and duties. Initiation. Comfort at work. Occupational safety documents. Hazard assessment. The work community and its impact. Economic effects of occupational safety.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

It will be announced at the beginning of the study period.
The limit of an approved performance is 70% of the maximum points.

Qualifications

Basics of mining industry and mining techniques

Objective

The student knows the key laws and regulations governing the mining sector and learns aspects related to working conditions, work methods and the safe use of machines. In addition, he knows the permits and inspections required for different jobs.

Content

Mining Act, regulations of the State Council and the Ministry of Labor and the Economy. Occupational Safety Act and Regulation. The Health Care Act and some decisions of the Government. Workplace safety notices. Licensed works. Physical and psychological occupational health and safety. Occupational health care arrangements. Manager's responsibilities and duties. Initiation. Comfort at work. Occupational safety documents. Hazard assessment. The work community and its impact. Economic effects of occupational safety.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

It will be announced at the beginning of the study period.
The limit of an approved performance is 70% of the maximum points.

Qualifications

Basics of mining industry and mining techniques

Objective

The student knows the key laws and regulations governing the mining sector and learns aspects related to working conditions, work methods and the safe use of machines. In addition, he knows the permits and inspections required for different jobs.

Content

Mining Act, regulations of the State Council and the Ministry of Labor and the Economy. Occupational Safety Act and Regulation. The Health Care Act and some decisions of the Government. Workplace safety notices. Licensed works. Physical and psychological occupational health and safety. Occupational health care arrangements. Manager's responsibilities and duties. Initiation. Comfort at work. Occupational safety documents. Hazard assessment. The work community and its impact. Economic effects of occupational safety.

Materials

We will announce it during the course.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

It will be announced at the beginning of the study period.
The limit of an approved performance is 70% of the maximum points.

Qualifications

Basics of mining industry and mining techniques

Objective

The student knows the key laws and regulations governing the mining sector and learns aspects related to working conditions, work methods and the safe use of machines. In addition, he knows the permits and inspections required for different jobs.

Content

Mining Act, regulations of the State Council and the Ministry of Labor and the Economy. Occupational Safety Act and Regulation. The Health Care Act and some decisions of the Government. Workplace safety notices. Licensed works. Physical and psychological occupational health and safety. Occupational health care arrangements. Manager's responsibilities and duties. Initiation. Comfort at work. Occupational safety documents. Hazard assessment. The work community and its impact. Economic effects of occupational safety.

Materials

We will announce it during the course.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

It will be announced at the beginning of the study period.
The limit of an approved performance is 70% of the maximum points.

Qualifications

Basics of mining industry and mining techniques

Objective

Repeat the high school chemistry curriculum and increase knowledge of environmental chemistry.

Content

Periodic table, mole and reactions
Concentration and pH concept
Acids and bases
Oxidation and reduction
Corrosion
Electrochemistry

Materials

Ilmoitetaan kurssilla.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The student can analyze problems in the subject area and produce alternative solution methods.
A commendable level requires that you get more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student can draw conclusions in the problems of the subject area.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The student recognizes the basic quantities of the subject area. The student finds the equations needed to solve problems in the subject area and knows how to solve them.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Objective

Repeat the high school chemistry curriculum and increase knowledge of environmental chemistry.

Content

Periodic table, mole and reactions
Concentration and pH concept
Acids and bases
Oxidation and reduction
Corrosion
Electrochemistry

Materials

Ilmoitetaan kurssilla.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The student can analyze problems in the subject area and produce alternative solution methods.
A commendable level requires that you get more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student can draw conclusions in the problems of the subject area.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The student recognizes the basic quantities of the subject area. The student finds the equations needed to solve problems in the subject area and knows how to solve them.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Objective

Students will be conversant with the usual components used in machine construction and be able to select the appropriate components according to the manufacturer's instructions and/or with the aid of ADP programmes.

Content

Couplings
Bearings
Gears, breaks
Power transfer

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to utilise mechanical component selection with expertise and can apply their acquired knowledge to solve complex problems. They can use calculation tools with routine.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to select and measure structural mechanical components as required. They are able to present their calculations clearly and systematically.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to use mechanical component calculation methods based on strength theory in basic situations.

Qualifications

Strength of Materials

Further information

2 RDI points

Objective

Students will be conversant with the usual components used in machine construction and be able to select the appropriate components according to the manufacturer's instructions and/or with the aid of ADP programmes.

Content

Couplings
Bearings
Gears, breaks
Power transfer

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to utilise mechanical component selection with expertise and can apply their acquired knowledge to solve complex problems. They can use calculation tools with routine.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to select and measure structural mechanical components as required. They are able to present their calculations clearly and systematically.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to use mechanical component calculation methods based on strength theory in basic situations.

Qualifications

Strength of Materials

Further information

2 RDI points

Objective

Students will be conversant with the usual components used in machine construction and be able to select the appropriate components according to the manufacturer's instructions and/or with the aid of ADP programmes.

Content

Couplings
Bearings
Gears, breaks
Power transfer

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to utilise mechanical component selection with expertise and can apply their acquired knowledge to solve complex problems. They can use calculation tools with routine.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to select and measure structural mechanical components as required. They are able to present their calculations clearly and systematically.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to use mechanical component calculation methods based on strength theory in basic situations.

Qualifications

Strength of Materials

Further information

2 RDI points

Objective

Students will carry out practical mechanical planning tasks and learn to apply acquired theoretical knowledge.

Content

Practical research, development and planning assignments

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to use professional concepts with expertise and can apply their professional competence as required in different situations. They are able to transform an idea in a development project into a commercial product sample independently. The students are able to develop systematic methods and instructions for the planning group so it can produce optimal solutions cost-effectively.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students use a wide range of professional concepts fluently. As members of the project group the students complete all given assignments well, and help and guide other members of the group.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students gain practical knowledge of practical mechanical design tasks while learning to apply theoretical knowledge in them. As members of the project group the students complete all given assignments to a satisfactory degree. They use professional concepts systematically and can work on individual tasks according to the commission.

Qualifications

Product Development

Further information

The course will be accomplished as R&D studies.
3 RDI points

Objective

Students will carry out practical mechanical planning tasks and learn to apply acquired theoretical knowledge.

Content

Practical research, development and planning assignments

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to use professional concepts with expertise and can apply their professional competence as required in different situations. They are able to transform an idea in a development project into a commercial product sample independently. The students are able to develop systematic methods and instructions for the planning group so it can produce optimal solutions cost-effectively.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students use a wide range of professional concepts fluently. As members of the project group the students complete all given assignments well, and help and guide other members of the group.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students gain practical knowledge of practical mechanical design tasks while learning to apply theoretical knowledge in them. As members of the project group the students complete all given assignments to a satisfactory degree. They use professional concepts systematically and can work on individual tasks according to the commission.

Qualifications

Product Development

Further information

The course will be accomplished as R&D studies.
3 RDI points

Objective

Students will understand the significance of a systematic product planning method and financial issues in product planning.

Content

Systematic mechanical planning
Product planning for flexible and economically viable production
Planning a modular product concept
Reliability and safety

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to use professional concepts with expertise and can apply their professional competence as required in different situations. They are able to select the best possible and available structural solution for the situation. They are able to develop systematic methods and planning instructions so that the design team can produce optimal solutions cost-effectively.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use a wide range of professional concepts fluently and are able to assess the suitability of methods for different situations in various operational environments. They are able to apply mechanical design methods to achieve optimal structural solutions.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students understand the methods of systematic mechanical design and are aware of the significance of economic factors in mechanical design.

Qualifications

Mechanics and Mechanisms
Mechanical Components

Further information

The course will partly be accomplished as R&D studies.
2 RDI points

Objective

Students will understand the significance of a systematic product planning method and financial issues in product planning.

Content

Systematic mechanical planning
Product planning for flexible and economically viable production
Planning a modular product concept
Reliability and safety

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to use professional concepts with expertise and can apply their professional competence as required in different situations. They are able to select the best possible and available structural solution for the situation. They are able to develop systematic methods and planning instructions so that the design team can produce optimal solutions cost-effectively.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use a wide range of professional concepts fluently and are able to assess the suitability of methods for different situations in various operational environments. They are able to apply mechanical design methods to achieve optimal structural solutions.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students understand the methods of systematic mechanical design and are aware of the significance of economic factors in mechanical design.

Qualifications

Mechanics and Mechanisms
Mechanical Components

Further information

The course will partly be accomplished as R&D studies.
2 RDI points

Objective

The student understands the basic principles and methods of vibration measurements, knows some industry standards. The student gains an understanding of work planning and the phenomena that significantly affect it. The student learns the basic principles of work planning.

Content

Concepts and methods of vibration measurements of rotating machines and equipment, standards. Concepts and definitions of work planning.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to use professional concepts with expertise and can apply their professional competence as required in different situations.
The student is able to develop the methods of monitoring the operation of machines in different operating environments.
A commendable level requires that you get more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use professional concepts fluently and are able to carry out different tasks in various operational environments.
The student understands the importance of machine control methods in industrial operations.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to use professional concepts systematically and are able to work on various tasks according to instructions. The student becomes aware of the importance of machine control methods in industrial operations.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Qualifications

Industrial Maintenance
Maintenance planning and controlling
Vibrational mechanics

Objective

The student understands the basic principles and methods of vibration measurements, knows some industry standards. The student gains an understanding of work planning and the phenomena that significantly affect it. The student learns the basic principles of work planning.

Content

Concepts and methods of vibration measurements of rotating machines and equipment, standards. Concepts and definitions of work planning.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to use professional concepts with expertise and can apply their professional competence as required in different situations.
The student is able to develop the methods of monitoring the operation of machines in different operating environments.
A commendable level requires that you get more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use professional concepts fluently and are able to carry out different tasks in various operational environments.
The student understands the importance of machine control methods in industrial operations.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to use professional concepts systematically and are able to work on various tasks according to instructions. The student becomes aware of the importance of machine control methods in industrial operations.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Qualifications

Industrial Maintenance
Maintenance planning and controlling
Vibrational mechanics

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Objective

The student knows how to create a route for condition monitoring measurements and perform simple measurements of rotating machines and devices.

Content

Laboratory exercises related to vibration measurements of condition monitoring (e.g. balancing, alignment, route measurement planning, analysis of measurements)
The student knows and recognizes the challenges of condition monitoring related to lubricants in industry.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The limit of an approved performance is 70% of the maximum points.

Qualifications

Industrial Maintenance
Condition based monitoring
Condition based monitoring for different industrial applications
Vibrational mechanics

Objective

The student knows how to create a route for condition monitoring measurements and perform simple measurements of rotating machines and devices.

Content

Laboratory exercises related to vibration measurements of condition monitoring (e.g. balancing, alignment, route measurement planning, analysis of measurements)
The student knows and recognizes the challenges of condition monitoring related to lubricants in industry.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The limit of an approved performance is 70% of the maximum points.

Qualifications

Industrial Maintenance
Condition based monitoring
Condition based monitoring for different industrial applications
Vibrational mechanics

Objective

The student understands the importance of operation and reliability for the trouble-free operation of the production plant and learns the different principles of modern maintenance and their application in practice

Content

Planning and management of maintenance activities, maintenance strategies, information systems, life cycle costs and their management, responsibilities and standards.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to use professional concepts with expertise and can apply their professional competence as required in different situations.
The student is able to develop industrial maintenance operations in different operating environments.
A commendable level requires that you get more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use professional concepts fluently and are able to carry out different tasks in various operational environments.
They understands the importance of industrial operation in industrial operations.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to use professional concepts systematically and are able to work on various tasks according to instructions. They becomes aware of the importance of industrial operation in industrial operations.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Qualifications

Industrial Maintenance

Objective

The student understands the importance of operation and reliability for the trouble-free operation of the production plant and learns the different principles of modern maintenance and their application in practice

Content

Planning and management of maintenance activities, maintenance strategies, information systems, life cycle costs and their management, responsibilities and standards.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to use professional concepts with expertise and can apply their professional competence as required in different situations.
The student is able to develop industrial maintenance operations in different operating environments.
A commendable level requires that you get more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use professional concepts fluently and are able to carry out different tasks in various operational environments.
They understands the importance of industrial operation in industrial operations.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to use professional concepts systematically and are able to work on various tasks according to instructions. They becomes aware of the importance of industrial operation in industrial operations.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Qualifications

Industrial Maintenance

Objective

Students will understand quality and the concept of quality management as well as how these are linked to business operations. Students will know the most common business quality control operations and be able to analyse and use collected information from quality control systems to develop operations.

Content

Concepts of quality
Quality leadership
Quality control systems
ISO 9000 etc Quality standards
Quality control methods
Sampling methods
Statistical methods
Quality costs

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to use professional concepts with expertise and can apply their professional competence as required in different situations. They are able to develop quality management operations in different operational environments.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use professional concepts fluently and are able to carry out different tasks in various operational environments. They understand the significance of quality management in industrial operations.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to use professional concepts systematically and are able to work on various tasks according to instructions. They are aware of the significance of quality management in industrial operations.

Further information

1 RDI point

Objective

Students will understand quality and the concept of quality management as well as how these are linked to business operations. Students will know the most common business quality control operations and be able to analyse and use collected information from quality control systems to develop operations.

Content

Concepts of quality
Quality leadership
Quality control systems
ISO 9000 etc Quality standards
Quality control methods
Sampling methods
Statistical methods
Quality costs

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to use professional concepts with expertise and can apply their professional competence as required in different situations. They are able to develop quality management operations in different operational environments.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to use professional concepts fluently and are able to carry out different tasks in various operational environments. They understand the significance of quality management in industrial operations.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to use professional concepts systematically and are able to work on various tasks according to instructions. They are aware of the significance of quality management in industrial operations.

Further information

1 RDI point

Objective

Students will know the foundations of mining and quarrying in open-pit and underground mines.

Content

Open-pit and underground mining; drilling and blasting, broken rock loading, conveying and crushing and mine reinforcement, water removal and ventilation.
Blasting legislation.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

It will be announced at the beginning of the study period.
The limit of an approved performance is 70% of the maximum points.

Qualifications

Basics of mining industry and mining techniques

Objective

Students will know the foundations of mining and quarrying in open-pit and underground mines.

Content

Open-pit and underground mining; drilling and blasting, broken rock loading, conveying and crushing and mine reinforcement, water removal and ventilation.
Blasting legislation.

Materials

Ilmoitetaan opintojakson alussa.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

It will be announced at the beginning of the study period.
The limit of an approved performance is 70% of the maximum points.

Qualifications

Basics of mining industry and mining techniques

Objective

Students will know the foundations of mining and quarrying in open-pit and underground mines.

Content

Open-pit and underground mining; drilling and blasting, broken rock loading, conveying and crushing and mine reinforcement, water removal and ventilation.
Blasting legislation.

Materials

We will announce it during the course.

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

It will be announced at the beginning of the study period.
The limit of an approved performance is 70% of the maximum points.

Qualifications

Basics of mining industry and mining techniques

Objective

Students will understand the link between structural loads and stress levels in a structure and be able to calculate strain in a completed structure in different basic cases and assess the importance of the result.

Content

Introduction
Deformation
Types of strain
Different strain cases
Stability
Fatigue endurance limit

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to use calculation methods for analysing the tension of statically defined structures with expertise and can apply their acquired knowledge to solve complex problems. They can use calculation tools with routine and understand the main factors affecting dynamic certainty.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to solve tension problems associated with statically defined structures as required. They are able to present their calculations clearly and systematically.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to strength calculation methods for simple tension and deformation analyses concerning statically defined structures.

Qualifications

Mechanics and Mechanisms
Structural Materials

Further information

1 RDI point

Objective

Students will understand the link between structural loads and stress levels in a structure and be able to calculate strain in a completed structure in different basic cases and assess the importance of the result.

Content

Introduction
Deformation
Types of strain
Different strain cases
Stability
Fatigue endurance limit

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to use calculation methods for analysing the tension of statically defined structures with expertise and can apply their acquired knowledge to solve complex problems. They can use calculation tools with routine and understand the main factors affecting dynamic certainty.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to solve tension problems associated with statically defined structures as required. They are able to present their calculations clearly and systematically.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to strength calculation methods for simple tension and deformation analyses concerning statically defined structures.

Qualifications

Mechanics and Mechanisms
Structural Materials

Further information

1 RDI point

Objective

To partly review and add to high school and vocational college mathematics, with the adoption of disciplined and determined working methods and to develop interaction skills.

Content

Number sets and calculations
Expressions and functions
Equations and systems of equations
Exponential function and logarithms

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to describe verbal problems using mathematical language and are able to interpret the significance of the results to assignments that arise during their professional studies.

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

The students are able to carry out second degree equations and present them as diagrams. They are proficient in doing equation pairs and systems of equations. They are proficient in exponential, logarithm and complex number calculations.

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

The students are proficient in expanding and simplifying the most common mathematical expressions. They able to form power and radical expressions and can do first degree equations.

Objective

To partly review and add to high school and vocational college mathematics, with the adoption of disciplined and determined working methods and to develop interaction skills.

Content

Number sets and calculations
Expressions and functions
Equations and systems of equations
Right-angled triangle and scalene triangle
Vectors

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to describe verbal problems using mathematical language and are able to interpret the significance of the results to assignments that arise during their professional studies.
A commendable level requires that you get more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to carry out second degree equations and present them as diagrams. They are proficient in doing equation pairs and systems of equations.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are proficient in expanding and simplifying the most common mathematical expressions. They able to form power and radical expressions and can do first degree equations.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Objective

To partly review and add to high school and vocational college mathematics, with the adoption of disciplined and determined working methods and to develop interaction skills.

Content

Number sets and calculations
Expressions and functions
Equations and systems of equations
Right-angled triangle and scalene triangle
Vectors

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to describe verbal problems using mathematical language and are able to interpret the significance of the results to assignments that arise during their professional studies.
A commendable level requires that you get more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to carry out second degree equations and present them as diagrams. They are proficient in doing equation pairs and systems of equations.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are proficient in expanding and simplifying the most common mathematical expressions. They able to form power and radical expressions and can do first degree equations.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Objective

To partly review and add to high school and vocational college mathematics, with the adoption of disciplined and determined working methods and to develop interaction skills.

Content

Number sets and calculations
Expressions and functions
Equations and systems of equations
Right-angled triangle and scalene triangle
Vectors

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to describe verbal problems using mathematical language and are able to interpret the significance of the results to assignments that arise during their professional studies.
A commendable level requires that you get more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to carry out second degree equations and present them as diagrams. They are proficient in doing equation pairs and systems of equations.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are proficient in expanding and simplifying the most common mathematical expressions. They able to form power and radical expressions and can do first degree equations.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Objective

To partly review and add to high school and vocational college mathematics.

Content

Geometry
Trigonometric functions and equations
Logarithmic and exponential functions
Derivative and integral

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to apply trigonometry and vector algebra to complete demanding tasks.
The student can apply differential calculus to more demanding tasks.
A commendable level requires that you get more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are proficient in vector dot, cross and triple products and their meaning. They understand the basic facts concerning determinants and matrices.
The student knows how to solve differential calculus problems of medium difficulty.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are proficient in the basic calculations for plane figures and three dimensional objects. They are proficient in the principles of trigonometry functions and understand the concept of vector.
The student masters the basic calculations of differential calculus.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Qualifications

Mathematics 1

Objective

To partly review and add to high school and vocational college mathematics.

Content

Geometry
Trigonometric functions and equations
Logarithmic and exponential functions
Derivative and integral

Materials

Insinöörin matematiikka;
Holmlund Eero, Huuskonen Maija, Makkonen Heikki, Surakka Jarkko, Tuomenlehto Ari
Edita

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to apply trigonometry and vector algebra to complete demanding tasks.
The student can apply differential calculus to more demanding tasks.
A commendable level requires that you get more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are proficient in vector dot, cross and triple products and their meaning. They understand the basic facts concerning determinants and matrices.
The student knows how to solve differential calculus problems of medium difficulty.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are proficient in the basic calculations for plane figures and three dimensional objects. They are proficient in the principles of trigonometry functions and understand the concept of vector.
The student masters the basic calculations of differential calculus.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Qualifications

Mathematics 1

Objective

To partly review and add to high school and vocational college mathematics.

Content

Geometry
Trigonometric functions and equations
Logarithmic and exponential functions
Derivative and integral

Materials

Insinöörin matematiikka;
Holmlund Eero, Huuskonen Maija, Makkonen Heikki, Surakka Jarkko, Tuomenlehto Ari
Edita

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to apply trigonometry and vector algebra to complete demanding tasks.
The student can apply differential calculus to more demanding tasks.
A commendable level requires that you get more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are proficient in vector dot, cross and triple products and their meaning. They understand the basic facts concerning determinants and matrices.
The student knows how to solve differential calculus problems of medium difficulty.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are proficient in the basic calculations for plane figures and three dimensional objects. They are proficient in the principles of trigonometry functions and understand the concept of vector.
The student masters the basic calculations of differential calculus.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Qualifications

Mathematics 1

Objective

The student gets to know practical economic mathematics.
The student becomes familiar with practical probability calculation and statistical calculation using e.g. the Excel program.

Content

Examining function descriptors and extreme values
Engineering applications

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to analyse the problems of the topic in hand and produce alternative methods of solving them.
A commendable level requires obtaining more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student has a fluent command of the basic concepts related to economic mathematics and events and knows how to apply them.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The student masters the basic concepts related to economic mathematics and statistics.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Qualifications

Mathematics 1
Mathematics 2

Objective

The student gets to know practical economic mathematics.
The student becomes familiar with practical probability calculation and statistical calculation using e.g. the Excel program.

Content

Examining function descriptors and extreme values
Engineering applications

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to analyse the problems of the topic in hand and produce alternative methods of solving them.
A commendable level requires obtaining more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student has a fluent command of the basic concepts related to economic mathematics and events and knows how to apply them.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The student masters the basic concepts related to economic mathematics and statistics.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Qualifications

Mathematics 1
Mathematics 2

Objective

The student gets to know practical economic mathematics.
The student becomes familiar with practical probability calculation and statistical calculation using e.g. the Excel program.

Content

Examining function descriptors and extreme values
Engineering applications

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to analyse the problems of the topic in hand and produce alternative methods of solving them.
A commendable level requires obtaining more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student has a fluent command of the basic concepts related to economic mathematics and events and knows how to apply them.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The student masters the basic concepts related to economic mathematics and statistics.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Qualifications

Mathematics 1
Mathematics 2

Objective

The student gets to know practical economic mathematics.
The student becomes familiar with practical probability calculation and statistical calculation using e.g. the Excel program.

Content

Examining function descriptors and extreme values
Engineering applications

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to analyse the problems of the topic in hand and produce alternative methods of solving them.
A commendable level requires obtaining more than 90% of the maximum points in the exam

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student has a fluent command of the basic concepts related to economic mathematics and events and knows how to apply them.
A good level requires that you get about 70 - 80% of the maximum points in the exam.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The student masters the basic concepts related to economic mathematics and statistics.
A satisfactory level requires that approximately 50 - 60% of the maximum points in the exam are obtained.

Qualifications

Mathematics 1
Mathematics 2

Objective

Students will be able to determine the stress levels of a statically determined solid and rigid parts in simple structures and mechanisms.

Content

Particle statics
Rigid part plane-statics
Load levels of simple supports
Beam structures
Joint mechanisms

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to use calculation methods for analysing statically defined structures with expertise and can apply their acquired knowledge to solve complex problems. They can use calculation tools with routine.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to solve stress problems associated with statically defined structures as required. They are able to present their calculations clearly and systematically.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to mechanical engineering calculation methods for simple stress analyses concerning statically defined structures.

Further information

1 RDI point

Objective

Students will be able to determine the stress levels of a statically determined solid and rigid parts in simple structures and mechanisms.

Content

Particle statics
Rigid part plane-statics
Load levels of simple supports
Beam structures
Joint mechanisms

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The students are able to use calculation methods for analysing statically defined structures with expertise and can apply their acquired knowledge to solve complex problems. They can use calculation tools with routine.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students are able to solve stress problems associated with statically defined structures as required. They are able to present their calculations clearly and systematically.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The students are able to mechanical engineering calculation methods for simple stress analyses concerning statically defined structures.

Further information

1 RDI point

Objective

The student is able to perform a motion analysis of the mechanism he or she has modeled and is able to interpret the results of the analysis.

Content

Determination of forces
Building a motion model
Contacts, springs and dampers
Redundancy
Transferring the results of motion analysis to FEA

Materials

Material given by the teacher

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Returning the excercise
Self-assessment
Course feedback

Qualifications

3D modeling

Objective

The student is able to perform a motion analysis of the mechanism he or she has modeled and is able to interpret the results of the analysis.

Content

Determination of forces
Building a motion model
Contacts, springs and dampers
Redundancy
Transferring the results of motion analysis to FEA

Materials

Material given by the teacher

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Returning the excercise
Self-assessment
Course feedback

Qualifications

3D modeling

Objective

The student is able to perform a motion analysis of the mechanism he or she has modeled and is able to interpret the results of the analysis.

Content

Determination of forces
Building a motion model
Contacts, springs and dampers
Redundancy
Transferring the results of motion analysis to FEA

Materials

Material given by the teacher

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Returning the excercise
Self-assessment
Course feedback

Qualifications

3D modeling

Objective

The student is able to perform a motion analysis of the mechanism he or she has modeled and is able to interpret the results of the analysis.

Content

Determination of forces
Building a motion model
Contacts, springs and dampers
Redundancy
Transferring the results of motion analysis to FEA

Materials

Material given by the teacher

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Returning the excercise
Self-assessment
Course feedback

Qualifications

3D modeling

Objective

The student knows the basics of measurement technology and knows the meaning and main structure of sensors and knows how to choose
and connect the right sensor for each application.

Content

Basics of measurement technology: e.g. measurement uncertainty and its determination and the concept of calibration
Basics of sensors
Switching position sensors
Displacement and rotation sensors
Speed ​​measurement
Measurement of acceleration and vibration
Measurement of force and pressure
Temperature and flow measurement
Barcode and piece identification
Automation safety functions
Connecting the sensors to the control system

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The student uses professional concepts expertly and knows how to apply professional knowledge appropriately in different situations.
The student is able to develop the functions of sensor technology in different operating environments.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student uses professional concepts fluently and widely and knows how to work in different tasks in different operating environments.
The student understands the importance of sensor technology in industrial operations and masters the basics of measurement technology.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The student uses professional concepts consistently and knows how to work in individual tasks in accordance with the assignment.
The student becomes aware of the importance of sensor technology in industrial operations and masters the basics of measurement technology.

Qualifications

Basics of electrical engineering

Objective

The student knows the basics of measurement technology and knows the meaning and main structure of sensors and knows how to choose
and connect the right sensor for each application.

Content

Basics of measurement technology: e.g. measurement uncertainty and its determination and the concept of calibration
Basics of sensors
Switching position sensors
Displacement and rotation sensors
Speed ​​measurement
Measurement of acceleration and vibration
Measurement of force and pressure
Temperature and flow measurement
Barcode and piece identification
Automation safety functions
Connecting the sensors to the control system

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The student uses professional concepts expertly and knows how to apply professional knowledge appropriately in different situations.
The student is able to develop the functions of sensor technology in different operating environments.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student uses professional concepts fluently and widely and knows how to work in different tasks in different operating environments.
The student understands the importance of sensor technology in industrial operations and masters the basics of measurement technology.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The student uses professional concepts consistently and knows how to work in individual tasks in accordance with the assignment.
The student becomes aware of the importance of sensor technology in industrial operations and masters the basics of measurement technology.

Qualifications

Basics of electrical engineering

Objective

The student knows the importance of control devices and various automation systems
implementation principles, structures and programming of programmable automation devices
platform.

Content

Basics of digital technology
Switching function
Programmable logics
Logic programming

Location and time

Etäopetus, Siemens -automaation virtuaalimaailma

Materials

Materiaali REPPU:ssa
Laitevalmistajien manuaalit ja ohjeet

Teaching methods

Luennot ja laboraatioharjoitukset

Exam schedules

Teoriaosion tentti helmi-maaliskuussa

Student workload

Lähiopetus ( Luennot, laboraatiot, tentti ) : : 50 h
Itsenäinen opiskelu: 84 h

Content scheduling

PLC – Programmable Logic Controller
PLC rakenne
PLC Tulo- ja lähtöasteet
Lukujärjestelmät
Muuttujatyypit
Analogisignaalin skaalaus
Ohjelmointikielet
Logiikkaohjelmointi
Laboraatioita ja harjoitustöitä aihepiiriin käsittelyyn sopivina ajanjaksoina

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The student uses concepts and operating principles related to control systems competently and extensively, and knows how to combine devices into entities used in automatic production.
The student knows how to select and critically evaluate different implementation options for control systems, can present alternative solutions and works as a member of a group, promoting the group's activities.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student knows how to name and describe the basic functions of control systems used in automatic production and consistently uses the terminology of the professional field.
The student knows how to apply different implementation options of control systems to automatic production and can justify his choice.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The student knows how to name and describe the devices of different control systems and works as a group member, taking the other group members into account.

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

Opiskelija käyttää asiantuntevasti ja laaja-alaisesti ohjausjärjestelmiin liittyviä käsitteitä ja toimintaperiaatteita sekä osaa yhdistää laitteita automaattisessa tuotannossa käytettäviksi kokonaisuuksiksi.
Opiskelija osaa valita ja arvioida kriittisesti erilaisia ohjausjärjestelmien toteutusvaihtoehtoja, ja osaa esittää vaihtoehtoisia ratkaisuja

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

Opiskelija osaa nimetä ja kuvailla automaattisessa tuotannossa käytettävien ohjausjärjestelmien perustoiminnot ja käyttää johdonmukaisesti ammattialan käsitteistöä.
Opiskelija osaa soveltaa erilaisia ohjausjärjestelmien toteutusvaihtoehtoja automaattiseen tuotantoon ja osaa perustella valintansa.

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

Opiskelija osaa nimetä ja kuvailla erilaisten ohjausjärjestelmien laitteita ja osaa toteuttaa ohjausjärjestelmän

Qualifications

Measuring and sensor technology

Objective

The student knows the importance of control devices and various automation systems
implementation principles, structures and programming of programmable automation devices
platform.

Content

Basics of digital technology
Switching function
Programmable logics
Logic programming

Location and time

KAMK

Teaching methods

Luennot ja laboraatioharjoitukset

Exam schedules

Teoriaosion tentti helmi-maaliskuussa

Student workload

Lähiopetus ( Luennot, laboraatiot, tentti ) : : 66 h
Itsenäinen opiskelu: 69 h

Content scheduling

PLC – Programmable Logic Controller
PLC rakenne
PLC Tulo- ja lähtöasteet
Lukujärjestelmät
Muuttujatyypit
Analogisignaalin skaalaus
Ohjelmointikielet
Logiikkaohjelmointi
Laboraatioita ja harjoitustöitä aihepiiriin käsittelyyn sopivina ajanjaksoina

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The student uses concepts and operating principles related to control systems competently and extensively, and knows how to combine devices into entities used in automatic production.
The student knows how to select and critically evaluate different implementation options for control systems, can present alternative solutions and works as a member of a group, promoting the group's activities.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student knows how to name and describe the basic functions of control systems used in automatic production and consistently uses the terminology of the professional field.
The student knows how to apply different implementation options of control systems to automatic production and can justify his choice.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The student knows how to name and describe the devices of different control systems and works as a group member, taking the other group members into account.

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

Opiskelija käyttää asiantuntevasti ja laaja-alaisesti ohjausjärjestelmiin liittyviä käsitteitä ja toimintaperiaatteita sekä osaa yhdistää laitteita automaattisessa tuotannossa käytettäviksi kokonaisuuksiksi.
Opiskelija osaa valita ja arvioida kriittisesti erilaisia ohjausjärjestelmien toteutusvaihtoehtoja, osaa esittää vaihtoehtoisia ratkaisuja ja toimii ryhmän jäsenenä edistäen ryhmän toimintaa.

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

Opiskelija osaa nimetä ja kuvailla automaattisessa tuotannossa käytettävien ohjausjärjestelmien perustoiminnot ja käyttää johdonmukaisesti ammattialan käsitteistöä.
Opiskelija osaa soveltaa erilaisia ohjausjärjestelmien toteutusvaihtoehtoja automaattiseen tuotantoon ja osaa perustella valintansa.

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

Opiskelija osaa nimetä ja kuvailla erilaisten ohjausjärjestelmien laitteita ja toimii ryhmän jäsenenä muut ryhmän jäsenet huomioiden.

Qualifications

Measuring and sensor technology

Objective

The student knows the importance of control devices and various automation systems
implementation principles, structures and programming of programmable automation devices
platform.

Content

Basics of digital technology
Switching function
Programmable logics
Logic programming

Location and time

KAMK Raahe

Teaching methods

Luennot ja laboraatioharjoitukset

Exam schedules

Teoriaosion tentti helmi-maaliskuussa

Student workload

Lähi- ja etäopetus ( Luennot, laboraatiot, tentti ) : : 66 h
Itsenäinen opiskelu: 69 h

Content scheduling

PLC – Programmable Logic Controller
PLC rakenne
PLC Tulo- ja lähtöasteet
Lukujärjestelmät
Muuttujatyypit
Analogisignaalin skaalaus
Ohjelmointikielet
Logiikkaohjelmointi
Laboraatioita ja harjoitustöitä aihepiiriin käsittelyyn sopivina ajanjaksoina

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The student uses concepts and operating principles related to control systems competently and extensively, and knows how to combine devices into entities used in automatic production.
The student knows how to select and critically evaluate different implementation options for control systems, can present alternative solutions and works as a member of a group, promoting the group's activities.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student knows how to name and describe the basic functions of control systems used in automatic production and consistently uses the terminology of the professional field.
The student knows how to apply different implementation options of control systems to automatic production and can justify his choice.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The student knows how to name and describe the devices of different control systems and works as a group member, taking the other group members into account.

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

Opiskelija käyttää asiantuntevasti ja laaja-alaisesti ohjausjärjestelmiin liittyviä käsitteitä ja toimintaperiaatteita sekä osaa yhdistää laitteita automaattisessa tuotannossa käytettäviksi kokonaisuuksiksi.
Opiskelija osaa valita ja arvioida kriittisesti erilaisia ohjausjärjestelmien toteutusvaihtoehtoja, osaa esittää vaihtoehtoisia ratkaisuja ja toimii ryhmän jäsenenä edistäen ryhmän toimintaa.

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

Opiskelija osaa nimetä ja kuvailla automaattisessa tuotannossa käytettävien ohjausjärjestelmien perustoiminnot ja käyttää johdonmukaisesti ammattialan käsitteistöä.
Opiskelija osaa soveltaa erilaisia ohjausjärjestelmien toteutusvaihtoehtoja automaattiseen tuotantoon ja osaa perustella valintansa.

Toteutuksen arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

Opiskelija osaa nimetä ja kuvailla erilaisten ohjausjärjestelmien laitteita ja toimii ryhmän jäsenenä muut ryhmän jäsenet huomioiden.

Qualifications

Measuring and sensor technology

Objective

The aim of the thesis is to develop and demonstrate the students' ability to apply knowledge and skills to specialist assignments linked to their studies. The thesis is usually accomplished for the benefit of working life concerning a topic agreed with the client (commissioning party) and therefore advances the students professional growth. The thesis is therefore a versatile indicator of the student's competence.

Content

Finding and agreeing on a suitable topic
Completion of necessary documentation
Acceptance process
Completion of thesis
Presentation of thesis
Maturity test

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

To be announced

Further information

15 RDI credits/points

Objective

The aim of the thesis is to develop and demonstrate the students' ability to apply knowledge and skills to specialist assignments linked to their studies. The thesis is usually accomplished for the benefit of working life concerning a topic agreed with the client (commissioning party) and therefore advances the students professional growth. The thesis is therefore a versatile indicator of the student's competence.

Content

Finding and agreeing on a suitable topic
Completion of necessary documentation
Acceptance process
Completion of thesis
Presentation of thesis
Maturity test

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

To be announced

Further information

15 RDI credits/points

Objective

The aim of the study course is to give the student an understanding of the stages involved in the thesis process and the readiness to start and complete the thesis process. The student knows how to search for information and write a complete scientific report.

Content

- Requirements related to the thesis
- Ethics related to the thesis
- The stages of the thesis process
- Searching for information and using sources
- Writing
- Project management and research activities

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The praiseworthy text skillfully combines the versatile use of source material and my own chosen point of view. The topic is discussed in a structured way and new aspects are also being developed. The conclusions and considerations are justified very clearly and consistently. The use of language is precise, neat and stylistically consistent. Source markings and the rest of the essay format are finished.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

In a good text, the source material has been used sufficiently extensively and quite expertly. Own and borrowed from sources are clearly distinguished from each other, and the use of sources is natural. The language is good and relatively consistent. Source markings have been made and the text is clear, but there may be some flaws in the markings or other layout.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

In a satisfactory text, the source material is used rather little or scarcely, and there are clear flaws in its processing. Source markings are missing or unclear. The whole is fragmented or the treatment of the theory is weak. The text has considerable, different and difficult to understand grammatical or structural deficiencies.

Objective

The aim of the study course is to give the student an understanding of the stages involved in the thesis process and the readiness to start and complete the thesis process. The student knows how to search for information and write a complete scientific report.

Content

- Requirements related to the thesis
- Ethics related to the thesis
- The stages of the thesis process
- Searching for information and using sources
- Writing
- Project management and research activities

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The praiseworthy text skillfully combines the versatile use of source material and my own chosen point of view. The topic is discussed in a structured way and new aspects are also being developed. The conclusions and considerations are justified very clearly and consistently. The use of language is precise, neat and stylistically consistent. Source markings and the rest of the essay format are finished.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

In a good text, the source material has been used sufficiently extensively and quite expertly. Own and borrowed from sources are clearly distinguished from each other, and the use of sources is natural. The language is good and relatively consistent. Source markings have been made and the text is clear, but there may be some flaws in the markings or other layout.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

In a satisfactory text, the source material is used rather little or scarcely, and there are clear flaws in its processing. Source markings are missing or unclear. The whole is fragmented or the treatment of the theory is weak. The text has considerable, different and difficult to understand grammatical or structural deficiencies.

Objective

Opiskelija osaa käyttää 3D CAD -sovelluksen pintamallinnustyökaluja kappaleiden ja tuotteiden mallintamisessa.

Content

Pintamallintamisen perusteet
Pintamallinnuspiirteet ja niiden käyttö
Pinta- ja solidimallintaminen eli hybridimallintaminen

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Harjoitustehtävien palautus
Itsearviointi
Opintojaksopalaute

Qualifications

3D-mallinnus

Objective

The student knows the basics and components of pneumatics and hydraulics and knows how to apply them in machine automation devices and knows maintenance-related issues.

Content

Producing and transferring compressed air
Compressed air components
Design and control of compressed air systems

Hydraulic energy
Hydraulic components
Hydraulic system design and control

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The student uses professional concepts expertly and knows how to apply professional knowledge appropriately in different situations.
The student is able to choose the best possible and available pneumatics/hydraulics method for each situation. The student is able to develop methods so that they are suitable for use in different situations in an economical way.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student uses professional concepts fluently and widely and knows how to evaluate the applicability of methods in different tasks in different operating environments.
The student understands the economic importance of pneumatics/hydraulics in industrial operations.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The student recognizes the main methods of pneumatics/hydraulics and their fields of application and uses professional concepts consistently.
The student becomes aware of the importance of knowing pneumatics/hydraulics methods in industrial operations.

Objective

The student knows the basics and components of pneumatics and hydraulics and knows how to apply them in machine automation devices and knows maintenance-related issues.

Content

Producing and transferring compressed air
Compressed air components
Design and control of compressed air systems

Hydraulic energy
Hydraulic components
Hydraulic system design and control

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The student uses professional concepts expertly and knows how to apply professional knowledge appropriately in different situations.
The student is able to choose the best possible and available pneumatics/hydraulics method for each situation. The student is able to develop methods so that they are suitable for use in different situations in an economical way.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student uses professional concepts fluently and widely and knows how to evaluate the applicability of methods in different tasks in different operating environments.
The student understands the economic importance of pneumatics/hydraulics in industrial operations.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

The student recognizes the main methods of pneumatics/hydraulics and their fields of application and uses professional concepts consistently.
The student becomes aware of the importance of knowing pneumatics/hydraulics methods in industrial operations.

Objective

Students will be able plan and implement a project together with its documentation, using different methods and as part of a team. They will understand the significance of project and development work and the differences between research projects and development work and tasks based on everyday thought.

Content

Structure and stages of a project
Funding
Groups and teams
Meetings procedure and communication
Communal idea generation methods
Methods for field-specific development work

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

To be announnced

Further information

1 RDI point

Objective

Students will be able plan and implement a project together with its documentation, using different methods and as part of a team. They will understand the significance of project and development work and the differences between research projects and development work and tasks based on everyday thought.

Content

Structure and stages of a project
Funding
Groups and teams
Meetings procedure and communication
Communal idea generation methods
Methods for field-specific development work

Evaluation scale

0 - 5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

To be announnced

Further information

1 RDI point